Consensus statements on end-of-life care in ICU - A Scandinavian multidisciplinary Delphi study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Iben Strøm Darfelt, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Pål Klepstad, Johanna Hästbacka, Gunnar Thorarensen, Andrew Campbell Robertson, Åse Valsø, Hanne Irene Jensen, Mikael Segerlantz, Juho T Lehto, Johan Malmgren, Morten Hylander Møller, Anne Højager Nielsen
{"title":"Consensus statements on end-of-life care in ICU - A Scandinavian multidisciplinary Delphi study.","authors":"Iben Strøm Darfelt, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Pål Klepstad, Johanna Hästbacka, Gunnar Thorarensen, Andrew Campbell Robertson, Åse Valsø, Hanne Irene Jensen, Mikael Segerlantz, Juho T Lehto, Johan Malmgren, Morten Hylander Møller, Anne Højager Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/aas.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-of-life care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is complex, requiring a balance of ethical, cultural and medical considerations while ensuring comfort and dignity for critically ill patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to develop a set of core domains for end-of-life care at Scandinavian ICUs along with corresponding consensus statements from patients, families and multidisciplinary experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a three-round Delphi study, a multidisciplinary advisory board from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland and Denmark, including ICU physicians, ICU nurses, palliative care specialists and a former ICU patient and family, developed potential end-of-life care domains of interest. Specialists with special competence/interest in end-of-life care and clinicians in all five countries were invited to rank these domains according to their importance and provide recommendations within each domain. The advisory board rephrased the recommendations into statements, which were sent out in the second round for participants to rate based on their level of agreement. Statements that did not achieve consensus in the second round were rephrased and redistributed in the third round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the third Delphi round, 59 statements across 10 domains reached consensus. The domains were: 1. Communication at ICU admission, 2. Withholding and withdrawal of therapy and end-of-life care decisions in the ICU, 3. Meeting religious and spiritual needs and the needs of vulnerable patients in the ICU, 4. Extubation and termination of mechanical ventilation at the end of life in the ICU, 5. Management and monitoring of symptoms at the end of life in the ICU, 6. Continuous sedation at the end of life in the ICU, 7. Indicators for specialist palliative care consultations in the ICU, 8. Patient transfers from the ICU at the end of life, 9. Bereavement care and 10. Debriefing in the ICU following a patient's death.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We developed core domains and consensus statements aiming at optimising end-of-life care that considers cultural and ethical nuances. The domains may help to shape end-of-life care guidelines in Scandinavian ICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70015"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-of-life care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is complex, requiring a balance of ethical, cultural and medical considerations while ensuring comfort and dignity for critically ill patients and their families.

Aim: We aimed to develop a set of core domains for end-of-life care at Scandinavian ICUs along with corresponding consensus statements from patients, families and multidisciplinary experts.

Methods: In a three-round Delphi study, a multidisciplinary advisory board from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland and Denmark, including ICU physicians, ICU nurses, palliative care specialists and a former ICU patient and family, developed potential end-of-life care domains of interest. Specialists with special competence/interest in end-of-life care and clinicians in all five countries were invited to rank these domains according to their importance and provide recommendations within each domain. The advisory board rephrased the recommendations into statements, which were sent out in the second round for participants to rate based on their level of agreement. Statements that did not achieve consensus in the second round were rephrased and redistributed in the third round.

Results: After the third Delphi round, 59 statements across 10 domains reached consensus. The domains were: 1. Communication at ICU admission, 2. Withholding and withdrawal of therapy and end-of-life care decisions in the ICU, 3. Meeting religious and spiritual needs and the needs of vulnerable patients in the ICU, 4. Extubation and termination of mechanical ventilation at the end of life in the ICU, 5. Management and monitoring of symptoms at the end of life in the ICU, 6. Continuous sedation at the end of life in the ICU, 7. Indicators for specialist palliative care consultations in the ICU, 8. Patient transfers from the ICU at the end of life, 9. Bereavement care and 10. Debriefing in the ICU following a patient's death.

Discussion: We developed core domains and consensus statements aiming at optimising end-of-life care that considers cultural and ethical nuances. The domains may help to shape end-of-life care guidelines in Scandinavian ICUs.

关于ICU临终关怀的共识声明-斯堪的纳维亚多学科德尔菲研究。
背景:重症监护室(ICU)的临终关怀是复杂的,需要平衡伦理、文化和医学方面的考虑,同时确保危重病人及其家属的舒适和尊严。目的:我们旨在为斯堪的纳维亚icu的临终关怀开发一套核心领域,以及患者,家属和多学科专家的相应共识声明。方法:在一项三轮德尔菲研究中,来自挪威、瑞典、芬兰、冰岛和丹麦的多学科咨询委员会,包括ICU医生、ICU护士、姑息治疗专家和前ICU患者及其家属,开发了潜在的临终关怀领域。所有五个国家对临终关怀有特殊能力/兴趣的专家和临床医生被邀请根据这些领域的重要性对它们进行排名,并在每个领域提供建议。咨询委员会将这些建议改写成声明,并在第二轮中发出,供参与者根据他们的同意程度进行评分。在第二轮未能达成协商一致意见的发言在第三轮中重新措辞和重新分发。结果:经过第三轮德尔菲,10个领域的59个陈述达成共识。域为:1;2. ICU入院时的沟通;3.在ICU中保留和退出治疗和临终关怀的决定。3 .满足宗教和精神需求以及ICU弱势患者的需求;ICU生命末期拔管和机械通气的终止,5。重症监护病房临终症状的管理和监测,6。ICU生命末期持续镇静,7。在ICU专科姑息治疗咨询指标,8。患者在生命结束时从ICU转出,9。10.丧亲关怀;病人死后在重症监护室做汇报讨论:我们制定了核心领域和共识声明,旨在优化考虑文化和伦理差异的临终关怀。这些领域可能有助于形成斯堪的纳维亚icu的临终关怀指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信