Beware of Plant DNA in Animal Dietary Metabarcoding: Lessons From a Strictly Insectivorous Bat.

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Luis P da Silva, Miguel Porto, Francisco Amorim, Pedro Beja, Vanessa A Mata
{"title":"Beware of Plant DNA in Animal Dietary Metabarcoding: Lessons From a Strictly Insectivorous Bat.","authors":"Luis P da Silva, Miguel Porto, Francisco Amorim, Pedro Beja, Vanessa A Mata","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.14100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA metabarcoding is increasingly used in dietary studies, but it has limitations, such as detecting nonfood taxa. This issue is frequently mentioned in the literature but poorly understood, limiting interpretation of results and mitigation strategies. We evaluate the extent and sources of nonfood plant DNA in dietary metabarcoding, based on 281 faecal samples of a strictly insectivorous bat. We modelled plant taxa detections in relation to pollination syndromes, flowering and fruiting phenology and habitat associations, and we estimated co-occurrences between plants and arthropods. The bat arthropod diet was consistent with previous studies. Plants were detected in 82.9% of samples, representing 148 taxa, and all pollination syndromes evaluated. Plant detections were more frequent during their flowering periods, particularly for those with mixed pollination syndromes, suggesting a relationship between flowering and detectability. Fruiting had a positive, albeit weaker, effect. There was a tendency for more frequent detection of forest plants and less frequent detection of plants associated with riparian and agricultural habitats. Co-occurrences between arthropods and plants were weak and inconsistent. Our results highlight the potential for widespread detection of nonfood plant DNA in metabarcoding studies, calling for great care when analysing the plant component of diets. Specifically, we recommend: (i) implementing strategies for reducing plant contamination during field sampling; (ii) using multiple field and lab negative controls; and (iii) using ancillary information (e.g., sample visual inspection and literature review) to aid interpretation of metabarcoding results. Moreover, we recommend that studies reporting plant consumption results greatly diverging from dietary patterns obtained through other methods should include detailed explanations of methodological steps taken to exclude the confounding effects of nonfood plant DNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":" ","pages":"e14100"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.14100","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DNA metabarcoding is increasingly used in dietary studies, but it has limitations, such as detecting nonfood taxa. This issue is frequently mentioned in the literature but poorly understood, limiting interpretation of results and mitigation strategies. We evaluate the extent and sources of nonfood plant DNA in dietary metabarcoding, based on 281 faecal samples of a strictly insectivorous bat. We modelled plant taxa detections in relation to pollination syndromes, flowering and fruiting phenology and habitat associations, and we estimated co-occurrences between plants and arthropods. The bat arthropod diet was consistent with previous studies. Plants were detected in 82.9% of samples, representing 148 taxa, and all pollination syndromes evaluated. Plant detections were more frequent during their flowering periods, particularly for those with mixed pollination syndromes, suggesting a relationship between flowering and detectability. Fruiting had a positive, albeit weaker, effect. There was a tendency for more frequent detection of forest plants and less frequent detection of plants associated with riparian and agricultural habitats. Co-occurrences between arthropods and plants were weak and inconsistent. Our results highlight the potential for widespread detection of nonfood plant DNA in metabarcoding studies, calling for great care when analysing the plant component of diets. Specifically, we recommend: (i) implementing strategies for reducing plant contamination during field sampling; (ii) using multiple field and lab negative controls; and (iii) using ancillary information (e.g., sample visual inspection and literature review) to aid interpretation of metabarcoding results. Moreover, we recommend that studies reporting plant consumption results greatly diverging from dietary patterns obtained through other methods should include detailed explanations of methodological steps taken to exclude the confounding effects of nonfood plant DNA.

小心动物饮食元条形码中的植物DNA:来自严格食虫蝙蝠的教训。
DNA元条形码越来越多地用于饮食研究,但它有局限性,如检测非食物分类群。这一问题在文献中经常被提及,但人们对其了解甚少,这限制了对结果的解释和缓解策略。基于281份严格食虫蝙蝠的粪便样本,我们评估了非食性植物DNA在饮食元条形码中的程度和来源。我们模拟了与授粉综合征、开花和结果物候学以及栖息地相关的植物分类群检测,并估计了植物和节肢动物之间的共现现象。蝙蝠节肢动物的饮食与先前的研究一致。82.9%的样本中检测到植物,代表148个分类群,并评估了所有授粉综合征。植物检出率在开花期间更为频繁,特别是那些具有混合授粉综合征的植物,这表明开花与检出率之间存在关系。结果产生了积极的影响,尽管效果较弱。森林植物的检测频率较高,而与河岸和农业生境有关的植物的检测频率较低。节肢动物与植物的共现性较弱且不一致。我们的研究结果强调了在元条形码研究中广泛检测非食用植物DNA的潜力,呼吁在分析饮食中的植物成分时要非常小心。具体来说,我们建议:(i)实施减少田间采样期间植物污染的策略;(ii)使用多个现场和实验室阴性对照;(iii)使用辅助信息(例如,样本目视检查和文献回顾)来帮助解释元条形码结果。此外,我们建议,报告植物消费结果与通过其他方法获得的饮食模式有很大差异的研究,应详细解释为排除非食用植物DNA的混淆效应而采取的方法步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信