Establishing a Common Lexicon for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis and Molecular Residual Disease: Insights From the BLOODPAC Consortium

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Andrew G. Hadd, Angela Silvestro, Brittany Avin McKelvey, Jonathan Baden, Christina Bormann Chung, Ben Brown, Fernando Cruz-Guilloty, James Godsey, Gregory Jones, Cheng-Ho Jimmy Lin, Dorys Lopez Ramos, Daniel Norton, Melanie R. Palomares, Carol Pena, Thereasa Rich, Angel Rodriguez, Mark Stewart, Diana Merino Vega, Lauren C. Leiman
{"title":"Establishing a Common Lexicon for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis and Molecular Residual Disease: Insights From the BLOODPAC Consortium","authors":"Andrew G. Hadd,&nbsp;Angela Silvestro,&nbsp;Brittany Avin McKelvey,&nbsp;Jonathan Baden,&nbsp;Christina Bormann Chung,&nbsp;Ben Brown,&nbsp;Fernando Cruz-Guilloty,&nbsp;James Godsey,&nbsp;Gregory Jones,&nbsp;Cheng-Ho Jimmy Lin,&nbsp;Dorys Lopez Ramos,&nbsp;Daniel Norton,&nbsp;Melanie R. Palomares,&nbsp;Carol Pena,&nbsp;Thereasa Rich,&nbsp;Angel Rodriguez,&nbsp;Mark Stewart,&nbsp;Diana Merino Vega,&nbsp;Lauren C. Leiman","doi":"10.1111/cts.70185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of a liquid biopsy to assess molecular residual disease (MRD) of solid tumors holds significant promise for improving outcomes for patients with cancer. Liquid biopsies are a minimally invasive approach for the identification of circulating tumor biomarkers through a simple blood sample. Assays capable of detecting MRD through analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are rapidly evolving for clinical study applications and therapeutic interventions. To address these opportunities, BLOODPAC—a multi-disciplinary consortium representing stakeholders from public, industry, academia, and regulatory agencies—formulated a lexicon that provides a shared framework and clear definitions using liquid biopsies for solid tumor MRD with an emphasis on ctDNA detection. The terms in the lexicon are categorized under general MRD, ctDNA testing methodologies, reporting results, and acquisition timepoints, including examples of current and potential clinical use cases for MRD tests. The overall goal is to provide a unified language and approaches to solid tumor MRD to advance applications of these technologies, allow data aggregation to strengthen future evidence, and facilitate regulatory approvals, leading to the use of liquid biopsy as an early endpoint in clinical trials. We believe that a common set of terminology and methods for solid tumor MRD can improve understanding and appropriate use of testing, accelerate clinical development, and improve outcomes for cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of a liquid biopsy to assess molecular residual disease (MRD) of solid tumors holds significant promise for improving outcomes for patients with cancer. Liquid biopsies are a minimally invasive approach for the identification of circulating tumor biomarkers through a simple blood sample. Assays capable of detecting MRD through analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are rapidly evolving for clinical study applications and therapeutic interventions. To address these opportunities, BLOODPAC—a multi-disciplinary consortium representing stakeholders from public, industry, academia, and regulatory agencies—formulated a lexicon that provides a shared framework and clear definitions using liquid biopsies for solid tumor MRD with an emphasis on ctDNA detection. The terms in the lexicon are categorized under general MRD, ctDNA testing methodologies, reporting results, and acquisition timepoints, including examples of current and potential clinical use cases for MRD tests. The overall goal is to provide a unified language and approaches to solid tumor MRD to advance applications of these technologies, allow data aggregation to strengthen future evidence, and facilitate regulatory approvals, leading to the use of liquid biopsy as an early endpoint in clinical trials. We believe that a common set of terminology and methods for solid tumor MRD can improve understanding and appropriate use of testing, accelerate clinical development, and improve outcomes for cancer patients.

Abstract Image

建立循环肿瘤DNA分析和分子残留疾病的通用词典:来自BLOODPAC联盟的见解
使用液体活检来评估实体肿瘤的分子残留病(MRD)对改善癌症患者的预后具有重大的希望。液体活检是一种通过简单血液样本识别循环肿瘤生物标志物的微创方法。通过分析循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)来检测MRD的检测方法正在迅速发展,用于临床研究和治疗干预。为了抓住这些机会,bloodpac——一个代表公共、工业、学术界和监管机构利益相关者的多学科联盟——制定了一个词典,提供了一个共享的框架和明确的定义,使用液体活检进行实体肿瘤MRD,重点是ctDNA检测。词典中的术语按一般MRD、ctDNA测试方法、报告结果和获取时间点进行分类,包括MRD测试的当前和潜在临床用例的示例。总体目标是为实体肿瘤MRD提供统一的语言和方法,以推进这些技术的应用,允许数据聚合以加强未来的证据,并促进监管部门的批准,从而将液体活检作为临床试验的早期终点。我们相信,实体肿瘤MRD的一套通用术语和方法可以提高对检测的理解和正确使用,加快临床发展,改善癌症患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信