{"title":"Fluvial Reworking Eliminates Small Craters, But Does Not Meaningfully Bias the Mars Interbedded-Crater Record","authors":"Andrew J. Moodie, Timothy A. Goudge","doi":"10.1029/2023JE008183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interpreting the structures, morphology, and chemistry of the exposed stratigraphic record on Mars is complicated by ancient surface processes that have variably removed parts of the record. Previous research has used the lack of smaller craters (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\le} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>50 m diameter) interbedded with fluvial deposits to constrain atmospheric pressure when rivers were active on Mars; the notion being that higher atmospheric pressure would have prevented smaller craters from forming. We hypothesize that contemporaneous channel lateral migration and avulsion could have reworked sedimentary deposits and eliminated craters from the stratigraphic record, thereby undermining atmospheric paleo-pressure interpretations. To test this hypothesis, we simulated coeval river-delta development and crater production, and quantified crater preservation in resulting stratigraphy. We document widespread crater rim degradation (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>67% of craters <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\le} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>50 m at least partially eroded), and observe a marked increase in preservation with increasing crater diameter. That is to say, fluvial reworking preferentially removes smaller craters from the stratigraphic record. However, synthetic crater-diameter distributions incorporating fluvial reworking effects do not reproduce observations on Mars, because many smaller craters generated remain preserved in the simulated stratigraphy. We find that, although river channels are sometimes in the right place to eliminate crater deposits from the stratigraphic record, production of smaller craters outpaces fluvial reworking under all modeled circumstances, and that a higher pressure ancient atmosphere is necessary to reproduce observations (i.e., consistent with existing interpretations of interbedded crater records). Our findings therefore bolster studies that assert fluvial reworking is not a primary control on smaller interbedded crater counts on Mars.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023JE008183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JE008183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interpreting the structures, morphology, and chemistry of the exposed stratigraphic record on Mars is complicated by ancient surface processes that have variably removed parts of the record. Previous research has used the lack of smaller craters (50 m diameter) interbedded with fluvial deposits to constrain atmospheric pressure when rivers were active on Mars; the notion being that higher atmospheric pressure would have prevented smaller craters from forming. We hypothesize that contemporaneous channel lateral migration and avulsion could have reworked sedimentary deposits and eliminated craters from the stratigraphic record, thereby undermining atmospheric paleo-pressure interpretations. To test this hypothesis, we simulated coeval river-delta development and crater production, and quantified crater preservation in resulting stratigraphy. We document widespread crater rim degradation (67% of craters 50 m at least partially eroded), and observe a marked increase in preservation with increasing crater diameter. That is to say, fluvial reworking preferentially removes smaller craters from the stratigraphic record. However, synthetic crater-diameter distributions incorporating fluvial reworking effects do not reproduce observations on Mars, because many smaller craters generated remain preserved in the simulated stratigraphy. We find that, although river channels are sometimes in the right place to eliminate crater deposits from the stratigraphic record, production of smaller craters outpaces fluvial reworking under all modeled circumstances, and that a higher pressure ancient atmosphere is necessary to reproduce observations (i.e., consistent with existing interpretations of interbedded crater records). Our findings therefore bolster studies that assert fluvial reworking is not a primary control on smaller interbedded crater counts on Mars.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.