A fit-for-purpose nongaseous impurity assay procedure for potential inorganic primary reference materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jong Wha Lee, Hyung Sik Min, Jinil Kim, Kyoung-Seok Lee
{"title":"A fit-for-purpose nongaseous impurity assay procedure for potential inorganic primary reference materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry","authors":"Jong Wha Lee,&nbsp;Hyung Sik Min,&nbsp;Jinil Kim,&nbsp;Kyoung-Seok Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Purity-evaluated inorganic materials, which are potential primary reference materials (PRMs) in chemistry, are crucial to the production of inorganic calibration solutions with metrological traceability to the International System of Units (SI). Purity evaluation is typically performed by individually assaying all possible impurities (gaseous and nongaseous) in a material, but technical challenges and the lack of resources are creating bottlenecks in developing effective purity assay procedures. This study describes a nongaseous impurity assay procedure developed and used at Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) to evaluate the purities of inorganic PRMs. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is used to assay more than 60 impurity elements in a single day, and external glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS) data are used to complement ICP-MS data. All aspects of the impurity assay procedure, including sample preparation, instrument operation, and data treatment, are described in detail. It is shown that the procedure is applicable to high-purity Al, As, Cu, NaCl, Se, Si, and Zn, and that a target relative uncertainty of 0.005 % for purity values can be satisfied even if individual impurity data are quite uncertain. Particular emphasis is on clearly specifying the measurand and target uncertainty for developing a fit-for-purpose assay procedure, as they determine the acceptable level of assay quality and help preventing misinterpretation of assay results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"30 2","pages":"117 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purity-evaluated inorganic materials, which are potential primary reference materials (PRMs) in chemistry, are crucial to the production of inorganic calibration solutions with metrological traceability to the International System of Units (SI). Purity evaluation is typically performed by individually assaying all possible impurities (gaseous and nongaseous) in a material, but technical challenges and the lack of resources are creating bottlenecks in developing effective purity assay procedures. This study describes a nongaseous impurity assay procedure developed and used at Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) to evaluate the purities of inorganic PRMs. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is used to assay more than 60 impurity elements in a single day, and external glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS) data are used to complement ICP-MS data. All aspects of the impurity assay procedure, including sample preparation, instrument operation, and data treatment, are described in detail. It is shown that the procedure is applicable to high-purity Al, As, Cu, NaCl, Se, Si, and Zn, and that a target relative uncertainty of 0.005 % for purity values can be satisfied even if individual impurity data are quite uncertain. Particular emphasis is on clearly specifying the measurand and target uncertainty for developing a fit-for-purpose assay procedure, as they determine the acceptable level of assay quality and help preventing misinterpretation of assay results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信