Combining Strategies for the Development of a Potentially Functional Yogurt: Structural, Physicochemical, and Microbiological Characterization

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Claudia Inés Vénica, Milena Aldana Solís, Matías Luis Senovieski, María Ayelén Vélez, María Julia Spotti, Paula Giménez, Silvina Roxana Rebechi, Gabriel Vinderola, María Cristina Perotti
{"title":"Combining Strategies for the Development of a Potentially Functional Yogurt: Structural, Physicochemical, and Microbiological Characterization","authors":"Claudia Inés Vénica,&nbsp;Milena Aldana Solís,&nbsp;Matías Luis Senovieski,&nbsp;María Ayelén Vélez,&nbsp;María Julia Spotti,&nbsp;Paula Giménez,&nbsp;Silvina Roxana Rebechi,&nbsp;Gabriel Vinderola,&nbsp;María Cristina Perotti","doi":"10.1007/s11947-024-03674-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work aims to develop and characterize potentially functional yogurts (high-proteins, with bifidobacteria, reduced in lactose and with in situ produced GOS) through combined strategies of ultrafiltration (UF) and the addition of dairy powder ingredient (whey protein concentrate 35% and 80% (WPC35 and WPC80) respectively, and skim milk powder (SMP)). Four yogurt formulations were tested: UF milk (Y1); UF milk and WPC80 (Y2); UF milk and WPC35 (Y3); and skim milk, SMP, and WPC80 (Y4). Carbohydrates, organic acids, particle size distribution, physicochemical, microbiological, rheological, and textural parameters were determined. Y4 presented the highest apparent diameter of casein micelles for both untreated and heat-treated milk, and Y1 presented the lowest values; size particle distributions were different among formulations. The yogurts had high protein content (6.61–7.88 g/100 g) were reduced in lactose (0.55–1.79 g/100 g) and contained GOS (0.33–0.71 g/100 g). All formulations were successful in maintaining Bifidobacteria (<i>Bifidobacterium lactis</i> INL1) and <i>Streptococcus</i> counts at high counts (&gt; 8.5 log CFU/g) during storage. The highest carbohydrate concentrations were for Y3 and Y4 yogurts, reaching the highest GOS concentration. All yogurts exhibited thixotropic behavior. Y4 yogurt showed a slightly different flow behavior than the other samples, exhibiting a higher flow behavior index and higher Kokini viscosity. Y2 and Y4 yogurts presented higher hardness; besides, Y4 presented a clear advantage in water holding capacity. The overall quality of yogurts was satisfactory, showing high potential as functional dairy products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":562,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","volume":"18 4","pages":"3599 - 3609"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-024-03674-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aims to develop and characterize potentially functional yogurts (high-proteins, with bifidobacteria, reduced in lactose and with in situ produced GOS) through combined strategies of ultrafiltration (UF) and the addition of dairy powder ingredient (whey protein concentrate 35% and 80% (WPC35 and WPC80) respectively, and skim milk powder (SMP)). Four yogurt formulations were tested: UF milk (Y1); UF milk and WPC80 (Y2); UF milk and WPC35 (Y3); and skim milk, SMP, and WPC80 (Y4). Carbohydrates, organic acids, particle size distribution, physicochemical, microbiological, rheological, and textural parameters were determined. Y4 presented the highest apparent diameter of casein micelles for both untreated and heat-treated milk, and Y1 presented the lowest values; size particle distributions were different among formulations. The yogurts had high protein content (6.61–7.88 g/100 g) were reduced in lactose (0.55–1.79 g/100 g) and contained GOS (0.33–0.71 g/100 g). All formulations were successful in maintaining Bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium lactis INL1) and Streptococcus counts at high counts (> 8.5 log CFU/g) during storage. The highest carbohydrate concentrations were for Y3 and Y4 yogurts, reaching the highest GOS concentration. All yogurts exhibited thixotropic behavior. Y4 yogurt showed a slightly different flow behavior than the other samples, exhibiting a higher flow behavior index and higher Kokini viscosity. Y2 and Y4 yogurts presented higher hardness; besides, Y4 presented a clear advantage in water holding capacity. The overall quality of yogurts was satisfactory, showing high potential as functional dairy products.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Bioprocess Technology
Food and Bioprocess Technology 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
19.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Food and Bioprocess Technology provides an effective and timely platform for cutting-edge high quality original papers in the engineering and science of all types of food processing technologies, from the original food supply source to the consumer’s dinner table. It aims to be a leading international journal for the multidisciplinary agri-food research community. The journal focuses especially on experimental or theoretical research findings that have the potential for helping the agri-food industry to improve process efficiency, enhance product quality and, extend shelf-life of fresh and processed agri-food products. The editors present critical reviews on new perspectives to established processes, innovative and emerging technologies, and trends and future research in food and bioproducts processing. The journal also publishes short communications for rapidly disseminating preliminary results, letters to the Editor on recent developments and controversy, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信