Spatial and temporal variations in net primary production and long-term trends between 2003 and 2022 in the Indian Ocean: A synthesis using different models

IF 2.3 3区 地球科学 Q2 OCEANOGRAPHY
V.V.S.S. Sarma , B. Sridevi , M.K. Ashitha
{"title":"Spatial and temporal variations in net primary production and long-term trends between 2003 and 2022 in the Indian Ocean: A synthesis using different models","authors":"V.V.S.S. Sarma ,&nbsp;B. Sridevi ,&nbsp;M.K. Ashitha","doi":"10.1016/j.dsr2.2025.105468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The measurements of net particulate primary production (NPP) with reference to space and time are limited in the Indian Ocean. Therefore, models are the only source of understanding spatial, temporal, and long-term variations. Different models have been developed to use remote sensing data to estimate NPP in the Indian Ocean. However, the accuracy of these models has not been evaluated. Here, we used the measured NPP data collected between 2003 and 2022 in the Indian Ocean to compare with different models such as Vertically Generalized Production (VGPM), Carbon-based Production (CbPM), Eppley-VGPM, and Carbon, Absorption, Fluorescence, Euphotic resolved (CAFE) models. This comparison suggested that CbPM simulated NPP with 10% underestimation compared to measured NPP in the Arabian Sea and South Indian Ocean (SIO), whereas VGPM simulated NPP well in the Bay of Bengal (BoB). The Eppley-VGPM over (under) estimated measured NPP by 20–30% in the SIO (Arabian Sea), while the CAFE model underestimated NPP in the BoB by 25%. No single model simulated the NPP well in the entire Indian Ocean compared to the measurements. All models reproduced seasonality in the Arabian Sea and SIO, but they failed in the case of the BoB. Compared to the measured NPP, the VGPM and CAFE models underestimated NPP, whereas the CbPM and Eppley-VGPM models overestimated it. Variable rates of changes in NPP in the past two decades were simulated in the Indian Ocean by different models. The long-term trends simulated by CbPM suggest decreasing trends in NPP south of 12°N and no trends north of 12°N in the Arabian Sea and increasing trends in NPP south of 20°S and decreasing trends north of 20°S in the SIO. The VGPM model indicated no significant trends in the BoB. The trends by the other models are variable and contrast in some regions. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate model to study long-term trends in NPP in the Indian Ocean is crucial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11120,"journal":{"name":"Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 105468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967064525000177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurements of net particulate primary production (NPP) with reference to space and time are limited in the Indian Ocean. Therefore, models are the only source of understanding spatial, temporal, and long-term variations. Different models have been developed to use remote sensing data to estimate NPP in the Indian Ocean. However, the accuracy of these models has not been evaluated. Here, we used the measured NPP data collected between 2003 and 2022 in the Indian Ocean to compare with different models such as Vertically Generalized Production (VGPM), Carbon-based Production (CbPM), Eppley-VGPM, and Carbon, Absorption, Fluorescence, Euphotic resolved (CAFE) models. This comparison suggested that CbPM simulated NPP with 10% underestimation compared to measured NPP in the Arabian Sea and South Indian Ocean (SIO), whereas VGPM simulated NPP well in the Bay of Bengal (BoB). The Eppley-VGPM over (under) estimated measured NPP by 20–30% in the SIO (Arabian Sea), while the CAFE model underestimated NPP in the BoB by 25%. No single model simulated the NPP well in the entire Indian Ocean compared to the measurements. All models reproduced seasonality in the Arabian Sea and SIO, but they failed in the case of the BoB. Compared to the measured NPP, the VGPM and CAFE models underestimated NPP, whereas the CbPM and Eppley-VGPM models overestimated it. Variable rates of changes in NPP in the past two decades were simulated in the Indian Ocean by different models. The long-term trends simulated by CbPM suggest decreasing trends in NPP south of 12°N and no trends north of 12°N in the Arabian Sea and increasing trends in NPP south of 20°S and decreasing trends north of 20°S in the SIO. The VGPM model indicated no significant trends in the BoB. The trends by the other models are variable and contrast in some regions. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate model to study long-term trends in NPP in the Indian Ocean is crucial.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
115
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography publishes topical issues from the many international and interdisciplinary projects which are undertaken in oceanography. Besides these special issues from projects, the journal publishes collections of papers presented at conferences. The special issues regularly have electronic annexes of non-text material (numerical data, images, images, video, etc.) which are published with the special issues in ScienceDirect. Deep-Sea Research Part II was split off as a separate journal devoted to topical issues in 1993. Its companion journal Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, publishes the regular research papers in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信