A scoping review of spinal cord stimulation for phantom limb pain

Stephen Jaffee , Rhea Verma , Mariam Vaezi , Trent Kite , Nestor Tomycz
{"title":"A scoping review of spinal cord stimulation for phantom limb pain","authors":"Stephen Jaffee ,&nbsp;Rhea Verma ,&nbsp;Mariam Vaezi ,&nbsp;Trent Kite ,&nbsp;Nestor Tomycz","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a debilitating condition that affects individuals following limb amputation. While medical management with anticonvulsants and physical therapy is the first-line treatment, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as an option for patients with persistent, refractory pain.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the current literature on SCS for PLP, focusing on pain reduction and associated complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted on reports of adults (≥18 years) with phantom limb pain treated with spinal cord stimulation. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by a full-text review based on predefined inclusion criteria. Extracted data included sample size, SCS lead placement, pain reduction, visual analog scale (VAS) and brief pain inventory (BPI) scores, and complications. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five reports met inclusion criteria, comprising 33 patients. Of these, 18 % of patients achieved 90–100 % pain reduction, 15 % had ≥80 % reduction, 6 % had ≥60 % reduction, and 15 % experienced ≥50 % reduction. Post-SCS visual analog scores were reported in two studies; one study reported a mean 50 % reduction in visual analog scale scores (VAS), while another found a median brief pain inventory (BPI) reduction of 43.5 %. Complications across all 33 patients included wound infection (6 %), transient weakness (3 %), cerebrospinal fluid leak (3 %), allergic dermatitis (3 %), and electrode site cyst (3 %). Most patients (84.8 %) received epidural lead placement, while 15.2 % had subdural placement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SCS may be effective in reducing pain in some PLP patients.However complications exist, with wound infection being the most common complication. The mechanism of action remains unclear, but PLP likely involves both central and peripheral pathology, which complicates treatment. Historically, SCS has shifted from subdural to epidural lead placement to minimize complications, with recent reports exploring dorsal root ganglion stimulation for more targeted pain relief. Spinal cord stimulation appears to provide meaningful pain reduction for patients with phantom limb pain, with a subset achieving near-complete relief. However, reported outcomes vary and complications remain a concern. Given the limited number of reports and small sample sizes, further research is needed to assess long-term efficacy and to minimize complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594425000329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a debilitating condition that affects individuals following limb amputation. While medical management with anticonvulsants and physical therapy is the first-line treatment, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as an option for patients with persistent, refractory pain.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the current literature on SCS for PLP, focusing on pain reduction and associated complications.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted on reports of adults (≥18 years) with phantom limb pain treated with spinal cord stimulation. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by a full-text review based on predefined inclusion criteria. Extracted data included sample size, SCS lead placement, pain reduction, visual analog scale (VAS) and brief pain inventory (BPI) scores, and complications. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results

Five reports met inclusion criteria, comprising 33 patients. Of these, 18 % of patients achieved 90–100 % pain reduction, 15 % had ≥80 % reduction, 6 % had ≥60 % reduction, and 15 % experienced ≥50 % reduction. Post-SCS visual analog scores were reported in two studies; one study reported a mean 50 % reduction in visual analog scale scores (VAS), while another found a median brief pain inventory (BPI) reduction of 43.5 %. Complications across all 33 patients included wound infection (6 %), transient weakness (3 %), cerebrospinal fluid leak (3 %), allergic dermatitis (3 %), and electrode site cyst (3 %). Most patients (84.8 %) received epidural lead placement, while 15.2 % had subdural placement.

Conclusions

SCS may be effective in reducing pain in some PLP patients.However complications exist, with wound infection being the most common complication. The mechanism of action remains unclear, but PLP likely involves both central and peripheral pathology, which complicates treatment. Historically, SCS has shifted from subdural to epidural lead placement to minimize complications, with recent reports exploring dorsal root ganglion stimulation for more targeted pain relief. Spinal cord stimulation appears to provide meaningful pain reduction for patients with phantom limb pain, with a subset achieving near-complete relief. However, reported outcomes vary and complications remain a concern. Given the limited number of reports and small sample sizes, further research is needed to assess long-term efficacy and to minimize complications.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信