The relationship between fibrous cap status or plaque surface morphology and intraplaque hemorrhage volume over time: The PARISK Study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Mohamed Kassem , Tahnee Gorissen , Mohammad Albenwan , Juul Bierens , Dianne H.K. van Dam-Nolen , Madieke I. Liem , Paul A.M. Hofman , Joachim E Wildberger , Jeroen Hendrikse , Werner Mess , Paul J. Nederkoorn , Daniel Bos , Patty Nelemans , Robert J. van Oostenbrugge , M. Eline Kooi
{"title":"The relationship between fibrous cap status or plaque surface morphology and intraplaque hemorrhage volume over time: The PARISK Study","authors":"Mohamed Kassem ,&nbsp;Tahnee Gorissen ,&nbsp;Mohammad Albenwan ,&nbsp;Juul Bierens ,&nbsp;Dianne H.K. van Dam-Nolen ,&nbsp;Madieke I. Liem ,&nbsp;Paul A.M. Hofman ,&nbsp;Joachim E Wildberger ,&nbsp;Jeroen Hendrikse ,&nbsp;Werner Mess ,&nbsp;Paul J. Nederkoorn ,&nbsp;Daniel Bos ,&nbsp;Patty Nelemans ,&nbsp;Robert J. van Oostenbrugge ,&nbsp;M. Eline Kooi","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is a strong predictor of stroke, but factors contributing to IPH development are incompletely understood. Therefore, we investigate the longitudinal relationship between a thin/ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC)/disrupted plaque surface and IPH volume.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>116 ischemic TIA/stroke patients with ipsilateral carotid plaques underwent baseline and two-year follow-up MRI. IPH and fibrous cap status (thick versus TRFC) on MRI and disruption of the plaque surface (smooth versus fissure/ulceration) on CTA were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the TRFC and disrupted plaque surface groups, the median IPH volume (tended) to decrease during follow-up (baseline: 97.3 IQR: [3.2-193.3] mm<sup>3</sup> versus follow-up: 29.7 [0.0-115.1] mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.09, and baseline: 25.1 [0.0-166.2] mm<sup>3</sup> versus follow-up: 11.2 [0.0-68.3] mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.04, respectively). In the group with a thick fibrous cap/smooth plaque surface, the median IPH volumes were zero at baseline and follow-up. The risk of IPH progression was higher in the TRFC/disrupted plaque groups (risk ratio (RR): 2.9 and 2.0, respectively) than in patients with a thick fibrous cap/smooth plaque surface.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TIA/stroke patients with a TRFC/disrupted plaque showed a net decrease in IPH volume over time, indicating plaque healing in some patients, but patients with a TRFC/disrupted plaque are still at increased risk for IPH progression.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01208025.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 108283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105230572500062X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is a strong predictor of stroke, but factors contributing to IPH development are incompletely understood. Therefore, we investigate the longitudinal relationship between a thin/ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC)/disrupted plaque surface and IPH volume.

Methods

116 ischemic TIA/stroke patients with ipsilateral carotid plaques underwent baseline and two-year follow-up MRI. IPH and fibrous cap status (thick versus TRFC) on MRI and disruption of the plaque surface (smooth versus fissure/ulceration) on CTA were assessed.

Results

In the TRFC and disrupted plaque surface groups, the median IPH volume (tended) to decrease during follow-up (baseline: 97.3 IQR: [3.2-193.3] mm3 versus follow-up: 29.7 [0.0-115.1] mm3, p = 0.09, and baseline: 25.1 [0.0-166.2] mm3 versus follow-up: 11.2 [0.0-68.3] mm3, p = 0.04, respectively). In the group with a thick fibrous cap/smooth plaque surface, the median IPH volumes were zero at baseline and follow-up. The risk of IPH progression was higher in the TRFC/disrupted plaque groups (risk ratio (RR): 2.9 and 2.0, respectively) than in patients with a thick fibrous cap/smooth plaque surface.

Conclusion

TIA/stroke patients with a TRFC/disrupted plaque showed a net decrease in IPH volume over time, indicating plaque healing in some patients, but patients with a TRFC/disrupted plaque are still at increased risk for IPH progression.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01208025.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信