Haematology CNSs' understanding and application of person-centred care: a pilot qualitative evaluation.

Heather Dolling
{"title":"Haematology CNSs' understanding and application of person-centred care: a pilot qualitative evaluation.","authors":"Heather Dolling","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the experiences of haematology clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) when delivering person-centred care (PCC). Particularly, the barriers and facilitators to its delivery, the specialists' understanding of PCC, and how they evaluate its success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of eight participants were interviewed using semi-structured interviews that were conducted virtually. The interview questions generated qualitative data to explore the experiences of the haematology CNS team. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and stored in a password-protected folder. The data were then thematically analysed and coded to generate the findings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All participants reported a shared understanding of PCC, supporting the current theories and literature surrounding it. They raised factors that acted as both facilitators and barriers towards the delivery of PCC. Additionally, the research identified a lack of awareness and use of methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the care the CNSs delivered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers an initial exploration into the experiences of haematology CNSs delivering PCC. This understanding could lead to the removal of barriers, thus enhancing the patient experience and quality of care. Recommendations are made to evaluate PCC through involving patients to share their views on what successful PCC means to them, and their ideas on how their nursing team might achieve this.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 5","pages":"280-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore the experiences of haematology clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) when delivering person-centred care (PCC). Particularly, the barriers and facilitators to its delivery, the specialists' understanding of PCC, and how they evaluate its success.

Methods: A total of eight participants were interviewed using semi-structured interviews that were conducted virtually. The interview questions generated qualitative data to explore the experiences of the haematology CNS team. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and stored in a password-protected folder. The data were then thematically analysed and coded to generate the findings.

Findings: All participants reported a shared understanding of PCC, supporting the current theories and literature surrounding it. They raised factors that acted as both facilitators and barriers towards the delivery of PCC. Additionally, the research identified a lack of awareness and use of methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the care the CNSs delivered.

Conclusions: This study offers an initial exploration into the experiences of haematology CNSs delivering PCC. This understanding could lead to the removal of barriers, thus enhancing the patient experience and quality of care. Recommendations are made to evaluate PCC through involving patients to share their views on what successful PCC means to them, and their ideas on how their nursing team might achieve this.

血液学CNSs对以人为本的护理的理解和应用:一项试点定性评估。
目的:探讨血液学临床护理专家(CNSs)在提供以人为本的护理(PCC)时的经验。特别是,其交付的障碍和促进因素,专家对PCC的理解,以及他们如何评估其成功。方法:采用虚拟半结构化访谈对8名参与者进行访谈。访谈问题产生了定性数据,以探索血液学CNS团队的经验。所有的采访都被记录、转录并存储在一个有密码保护的文件夹中。然后对数据进行主题分析和编码,以产生研究结果。研究结果:所有参与者都报告了对PCC的共同理解,支持了当前围绕PCC的理论和文献。它们提出了既促进又阻碍实施pccc的因素。此外,该研究还发现缺乏对CNSs提供的护理有效性进行评估的认识和方法的使用。结论:本研究对血液学CNSs提供PCC的经验进行了初步探索。这种理解可以消除障碍,从而提高患者的体验和护理质量。通过让患者分享他们对成功的PCC意味着什么以及他们的护理团队如何实现这一目标的看法,提出了评估PCC的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信