Effect of absorbent continence product design on handling time and caregiver physical posture: ergonomic evaluation.

Niuosha Sanaeifar, Rüdiger Kesselmeier, Simone Zettl, Deniz Limam
{"title":"Effect of absorbent continence product design on handling time and caregiver physical posture: ergonomic evaluation.","authors":"Niuosha Sanaeifar, Rüdiger Kesselmeier, Simone Zettl, Deniz Limam","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2025.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The design of absorbent continence products is important to family caregivers, because it can simplify pad changes, save time and improve lower back posture. However, the ergonomic design of many products has not received sufficient attention.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to assess the time required for handling three types of absorbent continence products and evaluate physical stress on the hand-arm and back-head areas of the participants in both the lying and standing position from an ergonomic perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one non-professionals without prior nursing experience in Germany participated in the study. Objective data, including the time required to apply, change and remove the products three times, the duration of harmful postures, and the subjective evaluation of the products according to ergonomic criteria were investigated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were significant differences between two application positions (lying down versus standing) for all products. Handling the products with the patient in a standing position was faster, requiring less stressful postures and fewer hand grips. Objective data showed that MoliCare<sup>®</sup> premium Elastic was the quickest product to handle and had the shortest duration of unfavourable postures. The MoliFlex (Belted) ranked second in terms of harmful postures, whereas the MoliCare premium Slip performed slightly better than the Belted product in the duration of change in the lying down position.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the design of absorbent continence products, it is important to consider that comfort and quality are important not only for patients but also for family caregivers. Choosing the correct continence product can minimise the time and physical effort required for product handling.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 5","pages":"272-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The design of absorbent continence products is important to family caregivers, because it can simplify pad changes, save time and improve lower back posture. However, the ergonomic design of many products has not received sufficient attention.

Aims: The study aimed to assess the time required for handling three types of absorbent continence products and evaluate physical stress on the hand-arm and back-head areas of the participants in both the lying and standing position from an ergonomic perspective.

Methods: Twenty-one non-professionals without prior nursing experience in Germany participated in the study. Objective data, including the time required to apply, change and remove the products three times, the duration of harmful postures, and the subjective evaluation of the products according to ergonomic criteria were investigated.

Findings: There were significant differences between two application positions (lying down versus standing) for all products. Handling the products with the patient in a standing position was faster, requiring less stressful postures and fewer hand grips. Objective data showed that MoliCare® premium Elastic was the quickest product to handle and had the shortest duration of unfavourable postures. The MoliFlex (Belted) ranked second in terms of harmful postures, whereas the MoliCare premium Slip performed slightly better than the Belted product in the duration of change in the lying down position.

Conclusion: In the design of absorbent continence products, it is important to consider that comfort and quality are important not only for patients but also for family caregivers. Choosing the correct continence product can minimise the time and physical effort required for product handling.

吸收性尿失禁产品设计对处理时间和护理者身体姿势的影响:人体工程学评价。
背景:吸水性尿失禁产品的设计对家庭护理人员很重要,因为它可以简化垫的更换,节省时间,改善下背部姿势。然而,许多产品的人体工程学设计并没有得到足够的重视。目的:本研究旨在评估三种吸收性自制产品的操作时间,并从人体工程学的角度评估参与者在躺姿和站立姿势下对手臂和后脑区域的生理压力。方法:选取21名德国无护理经验的非专业人员作为研究对象。调查了客观数据,包括三次涂抹、更换和移除产品所需的时间,有害姿势的持续时间以及根据人体工程学标准对产品的主观评价。结果:所有产品的两种应用位置(躺着与站立)之间存在显着差异。让患者站着处理产品的速度更快,需要更少的压力姿势和更少的手握。客观数据显示,MoliCare®premium Elastic是处理速度最快的产品,不利姿势持续时间最短。MoliFlex (Belted)在有害姿势方面排名第二,而MoliCare premium Slip在躺姿变化的持续时间方面表现略好于Belted产品。结论:在设计吸收性尿失禁产品时,不仅要考虑患者的舒适度和质量,而且要考虑家庭护理人员的舒适度和质量。选择正确的自制产品可以最大限度地减少产品处理所需的时间和体力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信