Clinical validation of a novel hand dexterity measurement device.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000744
Conor D Hayden, Bruce P Murphy, Deirdre Gilsenan, Bahman Nasseroleslami, Orla Hardiman, Deirdre Murray
{"title":"Clinical validation of a novel hand dexterity measurement device.","authors":"Conor D Hayden, Bruce P Murphy, Deirdre Gilsenan, Bahman Nasseroleslami, Orla Hardiman, Deirdre Murray","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of sensitive objective outcome measures for hand dexterity is a barrier for clinical assessment of neurological conditions and has negatively affected clinical trials. Here, we clinically validate a new method for measuring hand dexterity, a novel hand worn sensor that digitises the Finger Tapping Test. The device was assessed in a cohort of 180 healthy controls and 51 people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and compared against rating scales and traditional measures (Nine Hole Peg test and grip dynamometry). 14 features were extracted from the device and using a logistic regression algorithm, a 0-100 dexterity performance score was generated for each participant, which accounted for age/sex differences. The device returned objective ratings of a participant's hand dexterity (dominant, non-dominant and overall score). The average overall dexterity performance score in all healthy participants was 88 ± 17 (mean ± standard deviation). The overall dexterity score was statistically significantly worse in participants with ALS (age/sex matched healthy subset: 80 ± 20, ALS: 45 ± 32, p-value < 0.0001). The device also had a higher completion rate, (94% dominant hand) compared to the traditional measures (82% dominant hand). This test and scoring system have been validated and the regression model was developed using a framework that is potentially applicable to any relevant condition. This device could act as an objective outcome measure in clinical trials and may be useful in improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 3","pages":"e0000744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of sensitive objective outcome measures for hand dexterity is a barrier for clinical assessment of neurological conditions and has negatively affected clinical trials. Here, we clinically validate a new method for measuring hand dexterity, a novel hand worn sensor that digitises the Finger Tapping Test. The device was assessed in a cohort of 180 healthy controls and 51 people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and compared against rating scales and traditional measures (Nine Hole Peg test and grip dynamometry). 14 features were extracted from the device and using a logistic regression algorithm, a 0-100 dexterity performance score was generated for each participant, which accounted for age/sex differences. The device returned objective ratings of a participant's hand dexterity (dominant, non-dominant and overall score). The average overall dexterity performance score in all healthy participants was 88 ± 17 (mean ± standard deviation). The overall dexterity score was statistically significantly worse in participants with ALS (age/sex matched healthy subset: 80 ± 20, ALS: 45 ± 32, p-value < 0.0001). The device also had a higher completion rate, (94% dominant hand) compared to the traditional measures (82% dominant hand). This test and scoring system have been validated and the regression model was developed using a framework that is potentially applicable to any relevant condition. This device could act as an objective outcome measure in clinical trials and may be useful in improving patient care.

新型手部灵活性测量设备的临床验证。
缺乏敏感的客观结果测量手的灵活性是临床评估神经系统疾病的障碍,并对临床试验产生负面影响。在这里,我们临床验证了一种测量手灵巧度的新方法,一种新型的手戴传感器,将手指敲击测试数字化。该装置在180名健康对照者和51名肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者中进行了评估,并与评分量表和传统测量方法(九孔栓试验和握力测定仪)进行了比较。从设备中提取14个特征,并使用逻辑回归算法,为每个参与者生成0-100的灵巧性能评分,这考虑了年龄/性别差异。该设备返回参与者的手灵巧度的客观评分(优势,非优势和总体得分)。所有健康参与者的平均整体灵巧性得分为88±17(平均值±标准差)。ALS患者的总体灵巧性评分在统计学上显著差(年龄/性别匹配的健康亚组:80±20,ALS: 45±32,p值< 0.0001)。与传统的测量方法(82%的优势手)相比,该设备也有更高的完成率(94%的优势手)。该测试和评分系统已经过验证,并且使用可能适用于任何相关条件的框架开发了回归模型。该装置可作为临床试验的客观结果测量,并可用于改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信