Frailty and the Survival of Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Shanshan Jia, Min Zhang
{"title":"Frailty and the Survival of Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shanshan Jia, Min Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nur.22456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to investigate the association between frailty and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in women with endometrial cancer (EC). Frailty is increasingly recognized as a significant predictor of outcomes in cancer patients, yet its impact on survival among EC patients remains unclear. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to September 28, 2024 were searched for cohort studies evaluating frailty in relation to survival in EC patients. Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for OS or PFS, comparing frail versus nonfrail patients. A random-effects model was applied. Eight cohort studies involving 486,138 women reported the outcome of OS, and 4 of them involving 378 women also reported the outcome of PFS. Frailty was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-2.03, p < 0.001) without significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of this association. Subgroup analyses according to the mean age of the patients, tools for evaluating frailty, follow-up duration, and study quality score showed consistent results (p for subgroup difference: 0.35-0.98). Four studies indicated a significant association between frailty and worse PFS (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.24-2.95, p = 0.003), also with no heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The results of the study conclude that frailty is associated with poor survival in EC. Although these findings should be validated in large prospective cohort studies, this meta-analysis highlights the possible role of frailty assessment in risk stratification and prognostic prediction of patients with EC. No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the association between frailty and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in women with endometrial cancer (EC). Frailty is increasingly recognized as a significant predictor of outcomes in cancer patients, yet its impact on survival among EC patients remains unclear. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to September 28, 2024 were searched for cohort studies evaluating frailty in relation to survival in EC patients. Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for OS or PFS, comparing frail versus nonfrail patients. A random-effects model was applied. Eight cohort studies involving 486,138 women reported the outcome of OS, and 4 of them involving 378 women also reported the outcome of PFS. Frailty was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-2.03, p < 0.001) without significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of this association. Subgroup analyses according to the mean age of the patients, tools for evaluating frailty, follow-up duration, and study quality score showed consistent results (p for subgroup difference: 0.35-0.98). Four studies indicated a significant association between frailty and worse PFS (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.24-2.95, p = 0.003), also with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). The results of the study conclude that frailty is associated with poor survival in EC. Although these findings should be validated in large prospective cohort studies, this meta-analysis highlights the possible role of frailty assessment in risk stratification and prognostic prediction of patients with EC. No patient or public contribution.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信