Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70177
Chohee Bang, Jae-Jin Kwak
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.","authors":"Chohee Bang, Jae-Jin Kwak","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate the Korean version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (K-FPAS) and assess its reliability in evaluating the acceptance of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) among Korean patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A methodological research study was conducted to develop and validate the K-FPAS as a valuable tool for assessing ICD acceptance and its related factors in the Korean patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 243 participants, aged 18 years and older, who had received ICDs within the past year and were regularly monitored by cardiac specialists, were included in the study. The K-FPAS was meticulously translated and underwent expert validation, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis to establish its construct validity. Content validity was confirmed by seven experts, and concurrent validity was examined using the Short Form-36 Health Survey. The reliability of the K-FPAS was assessed for internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The K-FPAS demonstrated robust content and construct validity, consisting of 15 items organised into four subdomains: \"Return to Life,\" \"Device-Related Distress,\" \"Positive Appraisal,\" and \"Body Image Concerns.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The K-FPAS is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating ICD acceptance among Korean patients. It provides a robust methodological framework for exploring the multidimensional facets of ICD acceptance, particularly highlighting the significance of psychological and emotional well-being. This tool demonstrates considerable potential for advancing nursing research and guiding evidence-based interventions to enhance ICD acceptance and improve the overall quality of life for ICD recipients.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients contributed to this study by providing responses on the study questionnaires, and five hospitals supported the data collection process by providing suitable facilities for interviews and questionnaires. This research aims to benefit patients and improve their well-being through better ICD acceptance assessment and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e70177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To validate the Korean version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (K-FPAS) and assess its reliability in evaluating the acceptance of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) among Korean patients.

Design: A methodological research study was conducted to develop and validate the K-FPAS as a valuable tool for assessing ICD acceptance and its related factors in the Korean patient population.

Methods: A total of 243 participants, aged 18 years and older, who had received ICDs within the past year and were regularly monitored by cardiac specialists, were included in the study. The K-FPAS was meticulously translated and underwent expert validation, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis to establish its construct validity. Content validity was confirmed by seven experts, and concurrent validity was examined using the Short Form-36 Health Survey. The reliability of the K-FPAS was assessed for internal consistency.

Results: The K-FPAS demonstrated robust content and construct validity, consisting of 15 items organised into four subdomains: "Return to Life," "Device-Related Distress," "Positive Appraisal," and "Body Image Concerns."

Conclusion: The K-FPAS is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating ICD acceptance among Korean patients. It provides a robust methodological framework for exploring the multidimensional facets of ICD acceptance, particularly highlighting the significance of psychological and emotional well-being. This tool demonstrates considerable potential for advancing nursing research and guiding evidence-based interventions to enhance ICD acceptance and improve the overall quality of life for ICD recipients.

Patient or public contribution: Patients contributed to this study by providing responses on the study questionnaires, and five hospitals supported the data collection process by providing suitable facilities for interviews and questionnaires. This research aims to benefit patients and improve their well-being through better ICD acceptance assessment and support.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信