Comparison of Weight Loss and Improvement in Metabolic Comorbidities Between Endoscopic Gastroplasty and Lifestyle Modifications: A Meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kai Siang Chan, Sapphire Ho, Kathleen Pang, Aaryan Nath Koura, Aung Myint Oo, Saleem Ahmed, Danson Xue Wei Yeo, Charleen Yeo
{"title":"Comparison of Weight Loss and Improvement in Metabolic Comorbidities Between Endoscopic Gastroplasty and Lifestyle Modifications: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Kai Siang Chan, Sapphire Ho, Kathleen Pang, Aaryan Nath Koura, Aung Myint Oo, Saleem Ahmed, Danson Xue Wei Yeo, Charleen Yeo","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic gastroplasty (EG) is a less invasive method for managing obesity compared with bariatric surgery. However, evidence on the use of EG is still scarce. This study aims to review existing evidence comparing EG with lifestyle modifications (LM) in terms of weight loss and improvement in metabolic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 2023. Exclusion criteria were patients who received concomitant pharmacological therapy for weight loss, the use of other endoscopic interventions apart from EG, and patients with prior bariatric surgery. Based on the heterogeneity of included studies, meta-analysis was performed using either a fixed-effect model or a random-effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5 studies (4 RCTs and 1 retrospective study) with 1007 patients included in the pooled analysis. Only a minority were males (n=199, 19.8%), and only 1 study included a Sham procedure in the LM group. Six-month percentage total body weight loss (%TBWL) (n=3 studies, MD: 6.34, 95% CI: 2.89, 9.78, P<0.01) and 12-month %TBWL (n=4 studies, MD: 6.43, 95% CI: 2.62, 10.25, P<0.01) were significantly higher in EG compared with LM. Patients in the EG group also had significant improvement in control of diabetes mellitus (n=2 studies, OR: 29.10, 95% CI: 5.84, 145.08) and hypertension (n=2 studies, OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.70) compared with LM. Incidence of serious adverse events ranged from 2% to 5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EG is effective for weight loss and improvement in metabolic comorbidities compared with LM alone but is suboptimal based on the Food and Drug Administration thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic gastroplasty (EG) is a less invasive method for managing obesity compared with bariatric surgery. However, evidence on the use of EG is still scarce. This study aims to review existing evidence comparing EG with lifestyle modifications (LM) in terms of weight loss and improvement in metabolic syndrome.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 2023. Exclusion criteria were patients who received concomitant pharmacological therapy for weight loss, the use of other endoscopic interventions apart from EG, and patients with prior bariatric surgery. Based on the heterogeneity of included studies, meta-analysis was performed using either a fixed-effect model or a random-effect model.

Results: There were 5 studies (4 RCTs and 1 retrospective study) with 1007 patients included in the pooled analysis. Only a minority were males (n=199, 19.8%), and only 1 study included a Sham procedure in the LM group. Six-month percentage total body weight loss (%TBWL) (n=3 studies, MD: 6.34, 95% CI: 2.89, 9.78, P<0.01) and 12-month %TBWL (n=4 studies, MD: 6.43, 95% CI: 2.62, 10.25, P<0.01) were significantly higher in EG compared with LM. Patients in the EG group also had significant improvement in control of diabetes mellitus (n=2 studies, OR: 29.10, 95% CI: 5.84, 145.08) and hypertension (n=2 studies, OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.70) compared with LM. Incidence of serious adverse events ranged from 2% to 5%.

Conclusion: EG is effective for weight loss and improvement in metabolic comorbidities compared with LM alone but is suboptimal based on the Food and Drug Administration thresholds.

内镜胃成形术和生活方式改变对体重减轻和代谢并发症改善的比较:一项荟萃分析。
背景:与减肥手术相比,内镜胃成形术(EG)是一种微创的治疗肥胖的方法。然而,关于EG使用的证据仍然很少。本研究旨在回顾比较EG和生活方式改变(LM)在减轻体重和改善代谢综合征方面的现有证据。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2023年8月。排除标准是同时接受药物治疗减肥的患者,除EG外使用其他内镜干预的患者,以及既往有减肥手术的患者。基于纳入研究的异质性,采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果:共纳入5项研究(4项随机对照试验和1项回顾性研究)1007例患者。只有少数是男性(n=199, 19.8%),只有1项研究包括LM组的假手术。6个月总体重减轻百分比(%TBWL) (n=3项研究,MD: 6.34, 95% CI: 2.89, 9.78, p)结论:与单独使用LM相比,EG对体重减轻和代谢合并症的改善有效,但根据美国食品和药物管理局的阈值,EG不是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信