Choice of Anesthetic for Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Can Reduce the Use of Rescue Antiemetics in Postanesthesia Recovery Room: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Juraj Sprung, David O Warner, Omar M Ghanem, Lauren Y Lu, Marita Salame, Darrell R Schroeder, Toby N Weingarten
{"title":"Choice of Anesthetic for Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Can Reduce the Use of Rescue Antiemetics in Postanesthesia Recovery Room: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Juraj Sprung, David O Warner, Omar M Ghanem, Lauren Y Lu, Marita Salame, Darrell R Schroeder, Toby N Weingarten","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent adverse event after bariatric surgery and is associated with patient dissatisfaction and increased health care burden. Aggressive multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis and the use of propofol infusion during anesthesia are associated with the reduction of PONV. In this study, we examined the use of rescue antiemetics following bariatric surgery performed with 3 different anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV: (1) primary volatile (VOL) anesthetic and propofol (PROP) infusion (VOL+PROP), (2) volatile anesthetic with propofol and dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusions (VOL+PROP+DEX), or (3) opioid-sparing total intravenous anesthesia (PROP+DEX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we included patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2018-2022 who received 1 of 3 anesthetics: (1) VOL+PROP, (2) VOL+PROP+DEX, or (3) opioid-sparing PROP+DEX without a VOL. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis determined the association between the need for rescue-antiemetics in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and following PACU discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred thirty-two patients received VOL+PROP, 354 VOL+PROP+DEX, and 166 PROP+DEX, and all received prophylactic antiemetics during surgery. After surgery, the PROP+DEX patients received fewer rescue antiemetics in the PACU compared with VOL+PROP (11% vs. 24%, P=0.002), and VOL+PROP+DEX fewer compared with VOL+PROP (16% vs. 24%, P=0.023). This differential antinausea effect was limited to PACU stay only. Rescue antiemetic use increased across all anesthetic management groups following PACU discharge until midnight on the day of surgery (ranging from 38% to 46% across groups, P=0.71) and through the first postoperative day (ranging from 47% to 57% across groups, P=0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The benefit associated with anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV was present but did not persist past PACU discharge. This finding suggests that aggressive perioperative multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis combined with anesthetic strategies designed to prevent PONV after bariatric surgery have only a short-lived effect, thus health care staff in hospital wards may expect to encounter high rates of PONV in these patients. There is a need for the development of novel antinausea treatments to reduce the rate of this frequent postoperative complication.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent adverse event after bariatric surgery and is associated with patient dissatisfaction and increased health care burden. Aggressive multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis and the use of propofol infusion during anesthesia are associated with the reduction of PONV. In this study, we examined the use of rescue antiemetics following bariatric surgery performed with 3 different anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV: (1) primary volatile (VOL) anesthetic and propofol (PROP) infusion (VOL+PROP), (2) volatile anesthetic with propofol and dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusions (VOL+PROP+DEX), or (3) opioid-sparing total intravenous anesthesia (PROP+DEX).

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2018-2022 who received 1 of 3 anesthetics: (1) VOL+PROP, (2) VOL+PROP+DEX, or (3) opioid-sparing PROP+DEX without a VOL. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis determined the association between the need for rescue-antiemetics in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and following PACU discharge.

Results: Three hundred thirty-two patients received VOL+PROP, 354 VOL+PROP+DEX, and 166 PROP+DEX, and all received prophylactic antiemetics during surgery. After surgery, the PROP+DEX patients received fewer rescue antiemetics in the PACU compared with VOL+PROP (11% vs. 24%, P=0.002), and VOL+PROP+DEX fewer compared with VOL+PROP (16% vs. 24%, P=0.023). This differential antinausea effect was limited to PACU stay only. Rescue antiemetic use increased across all anesthetic management groups following PACU discharge until midnight on the day of surgery (ranging from 38% to 46% across groups, P=0.71) and through the first postoperative day (ranging from 47% to 57% across groups, P=0.20).

Conclusions: The benefit associated with anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV was present but did not persist past PACU discharge. This finding suggests that aggressive perioperative multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis combined with anesthetic strategies designed to prevent PONV after bariatric surgery have only a short-lived effect, thus health care staff in hospital wards may expect to encounter high rates of PONV in these patients. There is a need for the development of novel antinausea treatments to reduce the rate of this frequent postoperative complication.

目的:术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是减肥手术后经常出现的不良反应,与患者的不满和医疗负担的增加有关。积极的多模式止吐预防和麻醉期间使用异丙酚输注与减少 PONV 有关。在这项研究中,我们考察了减肥手术后使用 3 种不同麻醉策略以减少 PONV 的情况:(1) 主要挥发性(VOL)麻醉剂和丙泊酚(PROP)输注(VOL+PROP);(2) 挥发性麻醉剂与丙泊酚和右美托咪定(DEX)输注(VOL+PROP+DEX);或 (3) 阿片类药物稀释全静脉麻醉(PROP+DEX):在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们纳入了 2018-2022 年期间接受减肥手术的患者,他们接受了 3 种麻醉药中的 1 种:(1)VOL+PROP;(2)VOL+PROP+DEX;或(3)不使用 VOL 的阿片类药物稀释型 PROP+DEX。治疗的逆概率加权分析确定了麻醉后护理病房(PACU)和 PACU 出院后抢救止吐药需求之间的关联:332 名患者接受了 VOL+PROP,354 名患者接受了 VOL+PROP+DEX,166 名患者接受了 PROP+DEX,所有患者在手术期间都接受了预防性止吐药。术后,与 VOL+PROP 相比,PROP+DEX 患者在 PACU 接受的抢救性止吐药更少(11% 对 24%,P=0.002),与 VOL+PROP 相比,VOL+PROP+DEX 患者接受的抢救性止吐药更少(16% 对 24%,P=0.023)。这种不同的止呕效果仅限于在 PACU 停留期间。所有麻醉管理组在 PACU 出院后到手术当天午夜(各组从 38% 到 46% 不等,P=0.71)以及术后第一天(各组从 47% 到 57% 不等,P=0.20)止吐药的使用量都有所增加:结论:旨在减少 PONV 的麻醉策略带来的益处是存在的,但在 PACU 出院后并未持续。这一发现表明,积极的围手术期多模式止吐预防措施与旨在预防减肥手术后PONV的麻醉策略相结合,只能产生短暂的效果,因此医院病房的医护人员可能会遇到这些患者PONV发生率较高的情况。因此,有必要开发新型抗恶心疗法,以降低这种术后常见并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信