Increasing the Percentage of Problem Lists Marked as Reviewed at Discharge.

IF 2.1 Q1 Nursing
Samantha Neumeier, Madeline Van Dorpe, Hillary H Voss, Jorde Spitler, Rachelle Musselman, Cheyanne Harshman, Abiodun Omoloja, Paige Hampton, Kathleen Matic, Heather Dyer
{"title":"Increasing the Percentage of Problem Lists Marked as Reviewed at Discharge.","authors":"Samantha Neumeier, Madeline Van Dorpe, Hillary H Voss, Jorde Spitler, Rachelle Musselman, Cheyanne Harshman, Abiodun Omoloja, Paige Hampton, Kathleen Matic, Heather Dyer","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-007737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Problem lists (PLs) are key to ensuring patient safety, accuracy of documentation, and clear communication among providers within the electronic health record (EHR). However, PLs frequently remain out of date, lacking new diagnoses and retaining former or duplicate diagnoses. The aim of this project was to increase use of the PL by the pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) service by increasing the percentage of PLs marked as reviewed and updated at discharge while increasing accuracy of documentation in the PL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Weekly data on all patients discharged from the PHM service was collected, and medical record audits were performed by the clinical documentation integrity team for accuracy. Initial interventions focused on incorporating the PL into the standard discharge workflow using EHR tools (including SmartPhrases and wildcards in the discharge summary) as well as education. Later, data transparency and value incentives for attendings were incorporated for attending engagement. Data were reported and analyzed on statistical process control charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 18 months, the centerline of the PL being marked as reviewed at discharge improved from 26% to 92%. For updating the PL at discharge, the centerline shifted from 44% to 91%. Accuracy increased from 40% to 64% during the first 8 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PL use, including updating the PL, marking the PL as reviewed, and accuracy of the PL can be improved through education, EHR interventions, transparency of data, and emphasis on quality metrics. Incorporating the PL into the discharge process using existing EHR tools can optimize documentation and standardize workflow around the PL.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e134-e142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Problem lists (PLs) are key to ensuring patient safety, accuracy of documentation, and clear communication among providers within the electronic health record (EHR). However, PLs frequently remain out of date, lacking new diagnoses and retaining former or duplicate diagnoses. The aim of this project was to increase use of the PL by the pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) service by increasing the percentage of PLs marked as reviewed and updated at discharge while increasing accuracy of documentation in the PL.

Methods: Weekly data on all patients discharged from the PHM service was collected, and medical record audits were performed by the clinical documentation integrity team for accuracy. Initial interventions focused on incorporating the PL into the standard discharge workflow using EHR tools (including SmartPhrases and wildcards in the discharge summary) as well as education. Later, data transparency and value incentives for attendings were incorporated for attending engagement. Data were reported and analyzed on statistical process control charts.

Results: In 18 months, the centerline of the PL being marked as reviewed at discharge improved from 26% to 92%. For updating the PL at discharge, the centerline shifted from 44% to 91%. Accuracy increased from 40% to 64% during the first 8 months.

Conclusion: PL use, including updating the PL, marking the PL as reviewed, and accuracy of the PL can be improved through education, EHR interventions, transparency of data, and emphasis on quality metrics. Incorporating the PL into the discharge process using existing EHR tools can optimize documentation and standardize workflow around the PL.

增加问题清单在放行时标记为已审核的百分比。
目的:问题清单(PL)是确保患者安全、文档准确性以及电子病历(EHR)中医疗服务提供者之间清晰沟通的关键。然而,问题清单经常过时,缺少新的诊断,保留了以前或重复的诊断。本项目旨在提高儿科医院内科(PHM)服务对 PL 的使用率,方法是增加出院时标记为已审查和更新的 PL 的百分比,同时提高 PL 中记录的准确性:方法:每周收集从儿科医院医疗服务部门出院的所有患者的数据,并由临床文档完整性小组对病历进行审核,以确保其准确性。最初的干预措施主要是利用电子病历工具(包括出院摘要中的智能短语和通配符)和教育将 PL 纳入标准出院工作流程。后来,为了提高主治医师的参与度,还增加了数据透明度和对主治医师的价值激励。数据通过统计过程控制图进行报告和分析:在 18 个月内,出院时被标记为复查的 PL 中心线从 26% 提高到 92%。出院时更新 PL 的中心线从 44% 提高到 91%。在最初的 8 个月中,准确率从 40% 提高到 64%:通过教育、电子病历干预、数据透明化和强调质量指标,可改善 PL 的使用,包括更新 PL、标记 PL 已审查和 PL 的准确性。利用现有的电子病历工具将 PL 纳入出院流程,可以优化文件记录并规范 PL 的工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信