Identifying the Unmet Healthcare Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Experience Graft Loss: Learning From Patients' Experience.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Anita Marie Slominska, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, M Khaled Shamseddin, Saly El Wazze, Kathleen Gaudio, Amanda Vinson, Ann Bugeja, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Marcelo Cantarovich, Julie Ho, Shaifali Sandal
{"title":"Identifying the Unmet Healthcare Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Experience Graft Loss: Learning From Patients' Experience.","authors":"Anita Marie Slominska, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, M Khaled Shamseddin, Saly El Wazze, Kathleen Gaudio, Amanda Vinson, Ann Bugeja, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Marcelo Cantarovich, Julie Ho, Shaifali Sandal","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients with graft loss (KTR-GL) are an increasing group of patients whose care needs are largely unmet. The lack of patient perspectives is a key research gap. We conducted an in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL to identify their healthcare needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study adopted an interpretive descriptive methodology. Data collection entailed semistructured narrative interviews conducted until data saturation was achieved and was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 23 KTR-GL (women: 34.8%; mean age, 54.3 y). Six themes were identified that represent areas in which participants' needs may be inadequately acknowledged and/or met: (1) setting expectations (longevity of the graft, transplant is not a cure, risk of graft failure, anticipating transplant loss, and balancing hope and realism), (2) communicating with care team (support and empathy and clarifying the cause of graft failure), (3) support for transition to dialysis (shaped by prior experience, preparedness for the initiation of dialysis, lack of options, and dialysis requires adjustment), (4) navigating the path to retransplantation (understanding patient preferences, clarity and transparency, addressing ineligibility, preemptive transplant, and living donation), (5) psychosocial resources (access to psychological services, specific and adequate psychological support, reliable social worker, and peer support), and (6) lessons learned (building mutual trust, self-advocacy, defining a successful transplant, and gaining resilience).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL, we have identified several unmet healthcare needs that have practice and policy implications. Incorporating a patient-centered approach is needed to improve the healthcare experiences and, potentially, the outcomes of KTR-GL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplant recipients with graft loss (KTR-GL) are an increasing group of patients whose care needs are largely unmet. The lack of patient perspectives is a key research gap. We conducted an in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL to identify their healthcare needs.

Methods: This qualitative study adopted an interpretive descriptive methodology. Data collection entailed semistructured narrative interviews conducted until data saturation was achieved and was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Our sample included 23 KTR-GL (women: 34.8%; mean age, 54.3 y). Six themes were identified that represent areas in which participants' needs may be inadequately acknowledged and/or met: (1) setting expectations (longevity of the graft, transplant is not a cure, risk of graft failure, anticipating transplant loss, and balancing hope and realism), (2) communicating with care team (support and empathy and clarifying the cause of graft failure), (3) support for transition to dialysis (shaped by prior experience, preparedness for the initiation of dialysis, lack of options, and dialysis requires adjustment), (4) navigating the path to retransplantation (understanding patient preferences, clarity and transparency, addressing ineligibility, preemptive transplant, and living donation), (5) psychosocial resources (access to psychological services, specific and adequate psychological support, reliable social worker, and peer support), and (6) lessons learned (building mutual trust, self-advocacy, defining a successful transplant, and gaining resilience).

Conclusions: In this in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL, we have identified several unmet healthcare needs that have practice and policy implications. Incorporating a patient-centered approach is needed to improve the healthcare experiences and, potentially, the outcomes of KTR-GL.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信