Giulia Cerretti, Alberto Bosio, Giovanni Librizzi, Giovanna Pintacuda, Mario Caccese, Alessandro Salvalaggio, Marco Zoccarato, Alessandro Parisi, Marta Padovan, Marta Maccari, Francesco Cavallin, Luisa Bellu, Francesco Pasqualetti, Tamara Ius, Luca Denaro, Francesco Volpin, Marina Coppola, Sara Lonardi, Giuseppe Lombardi
{"title":"Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: does dose matter? Our monocentric and comparative experience.","authors":"Giulia Cerretti, Alberto Bosio, Giovanni Librizzi, Giovanna Pintacuda, Mario Caccese, Alessandro Salvalaggio, Marco Zoccarato, Alessandro Parisi, Marta Padovan, Marta Maccari, Francesco Cavallin, Luisa Bellu, Francesco Pasqualetti, Tamara Ius, Luca Denaro, Francesco Volpin, Marina Coppola, Sara Lonardi, Giuseppe Lombardi","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-04992-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bevacizumab is an anti-angiogenetic treatment that can be used in patients with recurrent glioblastoma, but there are limited and controversial data on the optimal dose and schedule, associated toxicities and survival benefits of different doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent IDHwt glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab at the Veneto Institute of Oncology was performed. Patients received bevacizumab in 2 different schedules (5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg q2w), as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>81 patients were analyzed, 33 received bevacizumab 5 mg/Kg, 48 received bevacizumab 10 mg/Kg. Median PFS was 4 months in both patients treated with 5 mg/kg and those treated with 10 mg/kg (p-value=0.08), median OS was 5 months in patients treated with 5 mg/kg and 7 months in those treated with 10 mg/kg (p-value=0.10). There was no difference in the use of steroid therapy between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events was not statistically different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in survival, PFS, response, toxicity and steroid reduction between the two different doses. These results may support the use of lower doses of the drug with comparable benefit for patients and with additional advantage in terms of health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04992-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Bevacizumab is an anti-angiogenetic treatment that can be used in patients with recurrent glioblastoma, but there are limited and controversial data on the optimal dose and schedule, associated toxicities and survival benefits of different doses.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent IDHwt glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab at the Veneto Institute of Oncology was performed. Patients received bevacizumab in 2 different schedules (5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg q2w), as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy.
Results: 81 patients were analyzed, 33 received bevacizumab 5 mg/Kg, 48 received bevacizumab 10 mg/Kg. Median PFS was 4 months in both patients treated with 5 mg/kg and those treated with 10 mg/kg (p-value=0.08), median OS was 5 months in patients treated with 5 mg/kg and 7 months in those treated with 10 mg/kg (p-value=0.10). There was no difference in the use of steroid therapy between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events was not statistically different.
Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in survival, PFS, response, toxicity and steroid reduction between the two different doses. These results may support the use of lower doses of the drug with comparable benefit for patients and with additional advantage in terms of health care costs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.