Initial Experience With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Laser Ablation of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastases.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Min Xu, Guo Tian, Danxia Xu, Tian'an Jiang
{"title":"Initial Experience With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Laser Ablation of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastases.","authors":"Min Xu, Guo Tian, Danxia Xu, Tian'an Jiang","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>To assess the feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided laser ablation (EUS-LA) of retroperitoneal lymph node (RPLN) metastasis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>RPLN metastasis is challenging to treat, partly due to hazardous location. EUS-LA is a new attractive option for lesions in high-risk or percutaneous difficult-to-reach locations. Here, we reported the initial experience with EUS-LA of RPLN metastases.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>From November 2016 through July 2023, patients with oligometastatic RPLN metastases who were not eligible or refused surgery were prospectively enrolled. EUS-LA was performed using a neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd: YAG) laser beam fiber ablation system. The technical success rate, focal control rate, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and adverse events were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients with 25 RPLN metastases were included in the study. EUS-LA was performed successfully in all patients. The 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month focal control rates were 96.0%, 86.4%, and 76.5%, respectively. During a median follow-up of 24 months (3 to 46 mo), the median diameter of the RPLN metastases changed from 22 mm (12 to 44 mm) at baseline to 8.5 mm (6 to 39 mm) at the final follow-up. After ablation, the VAS scores decreased significantly in all patients with pain. Two patients experienced self-limited abdominal pain, and no moderate or severe adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-LA showed high technical feasibility and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of oligometastatic RPLN metastases. In patients at high surgical risk, EUS-LA can be considered as an alternative therapeutic modality, which warrants a long-term follow-up study to verify the efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goals: To assess the feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided laser ablation (EUS-LA) of retroperitoneal lymph node (RPLN) metastasis.

Background: RPLN metastasis is challenging to treat, partly due to hazardous location. EUS-LA is a new attractive option for lesions in high-risk or percutaneous difficult-to-reach locations. Here, we reported the initial experience with EUS-LA of RPLN metastases.

Study: From November 2016 through July 2023, patients with oligometastatic RPLN metastases who were not eligible or refused surgery were prospectively enrolled. EUS-LA was performed using a neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd: YAG) laser beam fiber ablation system. The technical success rate, focal control rate, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and adverse events were assessed.

Results: Nineteen patients with 25 RPLN metastases were included in the study. EUS-LA was performed successfully in all patients. The 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month focal control rates were 96.0%, 86.4%, and 76.5%, respectively. During a median follow-up of 24 months (3 to 46 mo), the median diameter of the RPLN metastases changed from 22 mm (12 to 44 mm) at baseline to 8.5 mm (6 to 39 mm) at the final follow-up. After ablation, the VAS scores decreased significantly in all patients with pain. Two patients experienced self-limited abdominal pain, and no moderate or severe adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: EUS-LA showed high technical feasibility and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of oligometastatic RPLN metastases. In patients at high surgical risk, EUS-LA can be considered as an alternative therapeutic modality, which warrants a long-term follow-up study to verify the efficacy.

超声内镜引导下激光消融腹膜后淋巴结转移的初步经验。
目的:探讨超声引导下内镜下激光消融治疗腹膜后淋巴结转移的可行性和安全性。背景:RPLN转移是具有挑战性的治疗,部分原因是危险的位置。EUS-LA是一个新的有吸引力的选择病变在高风险或经皮难以到达的位置。在这里,我们报告了EUS-LA治疗RPLN转移的初步经验。研究:从2016年11月到2023年7月,前瞻性纳入了不符合条件或拒绝手术的低转移性RPLN转移患者。采用钕钇铝石榴石(Nd: YAG)激光束光纤烧蚀系统进行EUS-LA。评估技术成功率、病灶控制率、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和不良事件。结果:19例25例RPLN转移患者纳入研究。所有患者均成功行EUS-LA。3个月、6个月和12个月病灶控制率分别为96.0%、86.4%和76.5%。在中位随访24个月(3至46个月)期间,RPLN转移瘤的中位直径从基线时的22毫米(12至44毫米)变化到最终随访时的8.5毫米(6至39毫米)。消融后,所有疼痛患者的VAS评分均显著下降。2例患者出现自限性腹痛,无中度或重度不良事件报道。结论:EUS-LA在治疗低转移性RPLN转移方面具有很高的技术可行性和可接受的安全性。对于手术风险较高的患者,EUS-LA可作为一种替代治疗方式,其疗效有待长期随访研究验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信