Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Antibiotic Prescribing by Dental Practitioners Across the United Kingdom's Four Countries: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study of Population-Level Dispensing Data, 2016-2023.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jonathan Bowman-Newmark, Amin Vahdati, Anup Karki, Linda Young, Gerry Cleary, Wendy Thompson
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Antibiotic Prescribing by Dental Practitioners Across the United Kingdom's Four Countries: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study of Population-Level Dispensing Data, 2016-2023.","authors":"Jonathan Bowman-Newmark, Amin Vahdati, Anup Karki, Linda Young, Gerry Cleary, Wendy Thompson","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.13037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the rates of antibiotic prescribing by dental practitioners across the constituent countries of the United Kingdom between March 2020 and August 2023 and to estimate the total 'excess' prescribing that occurred during this interval beyond the rates predicted based upon trends between March 2016 and February 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study of dental practitioners' antibiotic prescribing, by secondary analysis of population-level National Health Service dispensing data from England, Scotland, Wales and Health and Social Care dispensing data from Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effective August 2023, the antibiotic items dispensed rate for each country remained in excess of that predicted based upon pre-pandemic trends. Between March 2020 and August 2023, those rates were 175.6, 227.2, 195.0 and 321.8 antibiotic items per 1000 population for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, respectively. Those represented estimated total 'excesses' of 27.7% (95% confidence limit [CL], 14.8, 43.7), 43.3% (95% CL, 29.9, 60.0), 33.2% (95% CL, 20.4, 49.0) and 42.9% (95% CL, 27.6, 62.3). Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences between England and Scotland, England and Northern Ireland, and Wales and Northern Ireland (p < 0.001), Scotland and Wales (p = 0.001), and Scotland and Northern Ireland (p = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference between England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With shared prescribing guidelines and a single professional regulatory framework, it was unsurprising that similar antibiotic prescribing trends were found across the United Kingdom. Further research is required to investigate the reasons for the differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the rates of antibiotic prescribing by dental practitioners across the constituent countries of the United Kingdom between March 2020 and August 2023 and to estimate the total 'excess' prescribing that occurred during this interval beyond the rates predicted based upon trends between March 2016 and February 2020.

Methods: Retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study of dental practitioners' antibiotic prescribing, by secondary analysis of population-level National Health Service dispensing data from England, Scotland, Wales and Health and Social Care dispensing data from Northern Ireland.

Results: Effective August 2023, the antibiotic items dispensed rate for each country remained in excess of that predicted based upon pre-pandemic trends. Between March 2020 and August 2023, those rates were 175.6, 227.2, 195.0 and 321.8 antibiotic items per 1000 population for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, respectively. Those represented estimated total 'excesses' of 27.7% (95% confidence limit [CL], 14.8, 43.7), 43.3% (95% CL, 29.9, 60.0), 33.2% (95% CL, 20.4, 49.0) and 42.9% (95% CL, 27.6, 62.3). Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences between England and Scotland, England and Northern Ireland, and Wales and Northern Ireland (p < 0.001), Scotland and Wales (p = 0.001), and Scotland and Northern Ireland (p = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference between England and Wales.

Conclusions: With shared prescribing guidelines and a single professional regulatory framework, it was unsurprising that similar antibiotic prescribing trends were found across the United Kingdom. Further research is required to investigate the reasons for the differences.

2019冠状病毒病大流行对英国四个国家牙科医生抗生素处方的影响:2016-2023年人口水平配药数据的药物流行病学研究
目的评估和比较 2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 8 月期间英国各成员国牙科医生开具抗生素处方的比例,并估算在此期间根据 2016 年 3 月至 2020 年 2 月期间的趋势预测的比例之外的 "超额 "处方总量:对牙科医生的抗生素处方进行回顾性药物流行病学研究,并对英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士的全民健康服务配药数据以及北爱尔兰的健康与社会保健配药数据进行二次分析:从 2023 年 8 月起,每个国家的抗生素配药率仍高于根据大流行前趋势预测的配药率。2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 8 月期间,英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰每千人口的抗生素配药率分别为 175.6、227.2、195.0 和 321.8。估计总 "超标 "率分别为 27.7%(95% 置信限 [CL],14.8, 43.7)、43.3%(95% 置信限,29.9, 60.0)、33.2%(95% 置信限,20.4, 49.0)和 42.9%(95% 置信限,27.6, 62.3)。配对比较显示,英格兰与苏格兰、英格兰与北爱尔兰、威尔士与北爱尔兰之间存在显著的统计学差异(p 结论:英格兰与苏格兰、英格兰与北爱尔兰、威尔士与北爱尔兰之间存在显著的统计学差异:在共享处方指南和单一专业监管框架的情况下,英国各地出现类似的抗生素处方趋势不足为奇。需要开展进一步研究,以探究造成差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信