Are attendance flexibility accommodations consistent with Section 504?

Michael R. Masinter Esq.
{"title":"Are attendance flexibility accommodations consistent with Section 504?","authors":"Michael R. Masinter Esq.","doi":"10.1002/dhe.31939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A growing number of students seek modifications of class attendance requirements, often labeled as “attendance flexibility,” as a disability accommodation for classes that cap the maximum permissible absences. Institutional practices appear to vary widely, and the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights has offered little recent guidance beyond repeatedly insisting on the importance of adherence to the process — leaving each institution to assess through the interactive process whether and under what circumstances Section 504 might require attendance flexibility. OCR has found schools in violation of Section 504 by failing to go through the interactive process and requiring students to negotiate extra absences with faculty (but has not found a violation by an institution that properly adhered to process).</p>","PeriodicalId":100378,"journal":{"name":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","volume":"30 9","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing number of students seek modifications of class attendance requirements, often labeled as “attendance flexibility,” as a disability accommodation for classes that cap the maximum permissible absences. Institutional practices appear to vary widely, and the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights has offered little recent guidance beyond repeatedly insisting on the importance of adherence to the process — leaving each institution to assess through the interactive process whether and under what circumstances Section 504 might require attendance flexibility. OCR has found schools in violation of Section 504 by failing to go through the interactive process and requiring students to negotiate extra absences with faculty (but has not found a violation by an institution that properly adhered to process).

出勤弹性住宿是否符合第504节的规定?
越来越多的学生寻求修改上课出勤要求,通常被称为“出勤灵活性”,作为一种对残疾人士提供的便利,限制了允许的最大缺勤率。各院校的做法似乎千差万别,教育部民权办公室(Office for Civil Rights)最近除了反复强调遵守这一程序的重要性之外,几乎没有提供什么指导意见——让各院校通过互动程序来评估504条款是否以及在什么情况下可能需要灵活的出勤率。OCR发现学校违反了第504条,因为他们没有通过互动程序,并要求学生与教师协商额外的缺课(但没有发现一个机构违反了这一程序)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信