Invasive Fungal Disease Associated With Targeted Agents for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review

EJHaem Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/jha2.1105
Samir Agrawal, Anjaneya Bapat, Christopher P. Eades, Shreyans Gandhi
{"title":"Invasive Fungal Disease Associated With Targeted Agents for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review","authors":"Samir Agrawal,&nbsp;Anjaneya Bapat,&nbsp;Christopher P. Eades,&nbsp;Shreyans Gandhi","doi":"10.1002/jha2.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving targeted agents for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Literature for this systematic review was identified through a PubMed search in April 2024, using AML, IFD and targeted therapy terms. The following filters were applied: published in the last 10 years and published in English.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The PubMed search yielded 54 results, of which 16 were deemed relevant for inclusion. Four additional references were identified through manual searches. The majority of publications focused on the incidence of IFD during treatment with targeted agents; the remainder focused on the efficacy of targeted treatments and reported IFD as an adverse event. Most publications were retrospective analyses. Prophylaxis use and agents differed across studies. In several studies, IFD incidence was above the 8% threshold identified for anti-mould prophylaxis. <i>Aspergillus</i> was the most commonly reported pathogen, and most IFD cases occurred in the lungs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>IFD is relatively common among patients with AML receiving targeted therapies, despite the use of prophylaxis. Prospective studies with detailed IFD reporting, together with large epidemiological studies, are required to better understand the risk factors for, and incidence and nature of IFD in this patient population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.1105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving targeted agents for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML).

Methods

Literature for this systematic review was identified through a PubMed search in April 2024, using AML, IFD and targeted therapy terms. The following filters were applied: published in the last 10 years and published in English.

Results

The PubMed search yielded 54 results, of which 16 were deemed relevant for inclusion. Four additional references were identified through manual searches. The majority of publications focused on the incidence of IFD during treatment with targeted agents; the remainder focused on the efficacy of targeted treatments and reported IFD as an adverse event. Most publications were retrospective analyses. Prophylaxis use and agents differed across studies. In several studies, IFD incidence was above the 8% threshold identified for anti-mould prophylaxis. Aspergillus was the most commonly reported pathogen, and most IFD cases occurred in the lungs.

Conclusions

IFD is relatively common among patients with AML receiving targeted therapies, despite the use of prophylaxis. Prospective studies with detailed IFD reporting, together with large epidemiological studies, are required to better understand the risk factors for, and incidence and nature of IFD in this patient population.

Abstract Image

侵袭性真菌疾病与靶向药物治疗急性髓系白血病相关:系统综述
目的探讨急性髓系白血病(AML)患者接受靶向药物治疗时侵袭性真菌病(IFD)的发生率。方法通过2024年4月的PubMed检索,使用AML、IFD和靶向治疗术语确定本系统评价的文献。使用了以下过滤器:最近10年出版的,并以英文出版。PubMed检索产生54个结果,其中16个被认为与纳入相关。通过人工搜索确定了另外四个参考文献。大多数出版物关注的是靶向药物治疗期间IFD的发生率;其余的研究集中于靶向治疗的疗效,并将IFD报告为不良事件。大多数出版物为回顾性分析。预防使用和药物在不同的研究中有所不同。在一些研究中,IFD的发病率高于抗霉预防确定的8%的阈值。曲霉是最常见的病原体,大多数IFD病例发生在肺部。结论:IFD在接受靶向治疗的AML患者中相对常见,尽管使用了预防性治疗。需要有详细IFD报告的前瞻性研究,以及大型流行病学研究,以更好地了解该患者群体中IFD的危险因素、发病率和性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信