The First Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Procedural Treatments of Dark Eye Circles (Periorbital Hyperpigmentations): One of the Most Common Cosmetic Concerns

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Arash Pour Mohammad, Roya Zeinali, Paria Jafary, Mahsa Mortaja, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Azadeh Goodarzi
{"title":"The First Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Procedural Treatments of Dark Eye Circles (Periorbital Hyperpigmentations): One of the Most Common Cosmetic Concerns","authors":"Arash Pour Mohammad,&nbsp;Roya Zeinali,&nbsp;Paria Jafary,&nbsp;Mahsa Mortaja,&nbsp;Alireza Jafarzadeh,&nbsp;Azadeh Goodarzi","doi":"10.1155/dth/9155535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> A notable trend has been observed toward procedural interventions for periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH), with a variety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment modalities being introduced. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of these diverse procedural treatments for POH in the medical literature.</p>\n <p><b>Method:</b> A systematic search was performed in major databases up to 2023, and studies were evaluated for clinical improvement, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. The retrieved studies were categorized as lasers and light therapies, chemical peels, PRP, carboxytherapy, fillers and injections, microneedling, and combination therapies.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 33 studies involving 1320 patients were evaluated. The meta-analysis of improvement rates revealed that lasers (fractional CO<sub>2</sub> and Q-switched or long-pulsed Nd: YAG) and combination treatments (microneedling + chemical peels or fillers + lasers) demonstrated the highest efficacy, with 82% and 75% of patients experiencing excellent or good (&gt; 50%) improvement, respectively. Chemical peels, carboxytherapy, and PRP were less effective, benefiting 63%, 54%, and 44% of patients in the same category, respectively. Although fillers and autologous fat injections showed marked improvement in 94% and 74% of patients, the comparison of their results was limited due to their representation by a single study in each category. Considering the meta-analysis of satisfaction rates, lasers and combination treatments also led, with 82% and 75% of patients expressing over 50% satisfaction with treatment, respectively. Adverse events were generally mild and transient across treatments. Common side effects of lasers included transient burning and erythema. The fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser was associated with discomfort, pain, and edema, with a shorter duration of swelling and erythema when combined with PRP. Q-switched and picosecond Nd:YAG lasers had higher postinflammatory hyperpigmentation rates compared to carboxytherapy and the picosecond 755-nm laser. The most common adverse effect of chemical peeling was erythema, with glycolic acid showing the maximum incidence.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> This systematic review reveals that lasers and combination therapies are the most effective and satisfactory treatments for POH, with generally mild and transient adverse events. However, further studies comprising larger sample sizes, multiple-arm designs, and longer follow-ups are needed to enable more robust comparisons.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11045,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Therapy","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/9155535","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/9155535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A notable trend has been observed toward procedural interventions for periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH), with a variety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment modalities being introduced. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of these diverse procedural treatments for POH in the medical literature.

Method: A systematic search was performed in major databases up to 2023, and studies were evaluated for clinical improvement, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. The retrieved studies were categorized as lasers and light therapies, chemical peels, PRP, carboxytherapy, fillers and injections, microneedling, and combination therapies.

Results: A total of 33 studies involving 1320 patients were evaluated. The meta-analysis of improvement rates revealed that lasers (fractional CO2 and Q-switched or long-pulsed Nd: YAG) and combination treatments (microneedling + chemical peels or fillers + lasers) demonstrated the highest efficacy, with 82% and 75% of patients experiencing excellent or good (> 50%) improvement, respectively. Chemical peels, carboxytherapy, and PRP were less effective, benefiting 63%, 54%, and 44% of patients in the same category, respectively. Although fillers and autologous fat injections showed marked improvement in 94% and 74% of patients, the comparison of their results was limited due to their representation by a single study in each category. Considering the meta-analysis of satisfaction rates, lasers and combination treatments also led, with 82% and 75% of patients expressing over 50% satisfaction with treatment, respectively. Adverse events were generally mild and transient across treatments. Common side effects of lasers included transient burning and erythema. The fractional CO2 laser was associated with discomfort, pain, and edema, with a shorter duration of swelling and erythema when combined with PRP. Q-switched and picosecond Nd:YAG lasers had higher postinflammatory hyperpigmentation rates compared to carboxytherapy and the picosecond 755-nm laser. The most common adverse effect of chemical peeling was erythema, with glycolic acid showing the maximum incidence.

Conclusion: This systematic review reveals that lasers and combination therapies are the most effective and satisfactory treatments for POH, with generally mild and transient adverse events. However, further studies comprising larger sample sizes, multiple-arm designs, and longer follow-ups are needed to enable more robust comparisons.

Abstract Image

黑眼圈(眼窝周围色素沉着)的药物和非药物程序性治疗的首次系统回顾和荟萃分析:最常见的美容问题之一
背景:眼窝周围色素沉着症(POH)的程序性干预已被观察到一个显著的趋势,各种药物和非药物治疗方式被引入。本系统综述旨在对医学文献中针对POH的不同程序性治疗方法进行综合评价。方法:对截至2023年的主要数据库进行系统检索,并对临床改善、患者满意度和不良事件进行评估。检索到的研究被分类为激光和光疗法、化学换肤、PRP、羧基疗法、填充和注射、微针和联合疗法。结果:共评估33项研究,涉及1320例患者。改善率的荟萃分析显示,激光(分数CO2和q开关或长脉冲Nd: YAG)和联合治疗(微针+化学换皮或填充剂+激光)显示出最高的疗效,82%和75%的患者经历了优秀或良好(>;50%)的改善。化学换肤、羧酸疗法和PRP效果较差,同一类别患者分别受益63%、54%和44%。虽然填充物和自体脂肪注射在94%和74%的患者中表现出明显的改善,但由于它们在每个类别中都是单一研究,因此对其结果的比较受到限制。考虑到满意度的荟萃分析,激光和联合治疗也处于领先地位,分别有82%和75%的患者对治疗表示超过50%的满意度。不良事件在治疗过程中通常是轻微和短暂的。激光常见的副作用包括短暂的灼烧和红斑。分数CO2激光与不适、疼痛和水肿有关,与PRP联合使用时,肿胀和红斑持续时间较短。调q和皮秒Nd:YAG激光与羧基治疗和皮秒755 nm激光相比,炎症后色素沉着率更高。化学脱皮最常见的不良反应是红斑,以乙醇酸发生率最高。结论:本系统综述显示,激光联合治疗是治疗POH最有效和满意的方法,一般不良事件轻微且短暂。然而,需要进一步的研究,包括更大的样本量、多组设计和更长时间的随访,以实现更可靠的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatologic Therapy
Dermatologic Therapy 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dermatologic Therapy has been created to fill an important void in the dermatologic literature: the lack of a readily available source of up-to-date information on the treatment of specific cutaneous diseases and the practical application of specific treatment modalities. Each issue of the journal consists of a series of scholarly review articles written by leaders in dermatology in which they describe, in very specific terms, how they treat particular cutaneous diseases and how they use specific therapeutic agents. The information contained in each issue is so practical and detailed that the reader should be able to directly apply various treatment approaches to daily clinical situations. Because of the specific and practical nature of this publication, Dermatologic Therapy not only serves as a readily available resource for the day-to-day treatment of patients, but also as an evolving therapeutic textbook for the treatment of dermatologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信