Three-dimensional evaluation of stem placement accuracy with the conventional guide in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and its relevance to clinical outcomes

Q2 Medicine
Katsumasa Nakazawa MD , Tomoya Manaka MD, PhD , Yukihide Minoda MD, PhD , Yoshihiro Hirakawa MD, PhD , Yoichi Ito MD, PhD , Hayato Shimizu MD , Ryosuke Iio MD , Hiroaki Nakamura MD, PhD
{"title":"Three-dimensional evaluation of stem placement accuracy with the conventional guide in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and its relevance to clinical outcomes","authors":"Katsumasa Nakazawa MD ,&nbsp;Tomoya Manaka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukihide Minoda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Hirakawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoichi Ito MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hayato Shimizu MD ,&nbsp;Ryosuke Iio MD ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nakamura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Placement of retroversion of the stem (RS) is important in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. A conventional guide, based on the forearm, has been used for stem placement; however, only a few studies have reported the accuracy of stem placement using conventional guides. In this study, a three-dimensional postoperative evaluation software was used to investigate the accuracy of RS placement using a conventional guide and its effect on postoperative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study was performed by a single surgeon (a board-certified specialist with more than 15 years of experience in performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty) using the Exactech Equinoxe Reverse Shoulder System (Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA). Forty-nine patients who were followed up for at least 2 years were included. The target RS angle of the humeral component was set to 20°. Postoperative implant placement, including RS, was assessed with a three-dimensional planning software using computed tomography images obtained postoperatively. Postoperative range of motion and its relationship with clinical outcomes were also evaluated as clinical assessment. Furthermore, a subanalysis was performed comparing the 0-20° RS group with the other groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean postoperative RS was 13.2 ± 11.9° and was placed within 0-20° in 31/49 patients (63.3%). A correlation was observed between postoperative external rotation and RS (r = 0.30, <em>P</em> = .03). In a further subanalysis, the Constant–Murley score was significantly higher in the 0-20° RS group (<em>P</em> = .03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Placement of the RS using a conventional guide varied from the target position. RS correlated with postoperative external rotation, and RS within 0-20° significantly improved clinical outcomes. These results suggested that accurate placement of the RS may improve clinical outcomes. Therefore, the development of surgical assistive technologies for accurate placement is necessary to ensure accurate stem placement to avoid human error.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 436-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Placement of retroversion of the stem (RS) is important in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. A conventional guide, based on the forearm, has been used for stem placement; however, only a few studies have reported the accuracy of stem placement using conventional guides. In this study, a three-dimensional postoperative evaluation software was used to investigate the accuracy of RS placement using a conventional guide and its effect on postoperative outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study was performed by a single surgeon (a board-certified specialist with more than 15 years of experience in performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty) using the Exactech Equinoxe Reverse Shoulder System (Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA). Forty-nine patients who were followed up for at least 2 years were included. The target RS angle of the humeral component was set to 20°. Postoperative implant placement, including RS, was assessed with a three-dimensional planning software using computed tomography images obtained postoperatively. Postoperative range of motion and its relationship with clinical outcomes were also evaluated as clinical assessment. Furthermore, a subanalysis was performed comparing the 0-20° RS group with the other groups.

Results

The mean postoperative RS was 13.2 ± 11.9° and was placed within 0-20° in 31/49 patients (63.3%). A correlation was observed between postoperative external rotation and RS (r = 0.30, P = .03). In a further subanalysis, the Constant–Murley score was significantly higher in the 0-20° RS group (P = .03).

Conclusion

Placement of the RS using a conventional guide varied from the target position. RS correlated with postoperative external rotation, and RS within 0-20° significantly improved clinical outcomes. These results suggested that accurate placement of the RS may improve clinical outcomes. Therefore, the development of surgical assistive technologies for accurate placement is necessary to ensure accurate stem placement to avoid human error.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信