Short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with navigation system in the Asian population: a retrospective comparative study

Q2 Medicine
Jae Soo Kim MD , Su Cheol Kim MD , Jong Hun Park MD , Hyun Gon Kim MD , Dong Hyun Kim MD , Hyoung Seok Jung MD , Sang Min Lee CES , Jae Chul Yoo MD
{"title":"Short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with navigation system in the Asian population: a retrospective comparative study","authors":"Jae Soo Kim MD ,&nbsp;Su Cheol Kim MD ,&nbsp;Jong Hun Park MD ,&nbsp;Hyun Gon Kim MD ,&nbsp;Dong Hyun Kim MD ,&nbsp;Hyoung Seok Jung MD ,&nbsp;Sang Min Lee CES ,&nbsp;Jae Chul Yoo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In reverse total arthroplasty (rTSA), glenoid component positioning is a critical factor for outcomes especially in Asian populations with smaller glenoids. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of rTSA with and without the navigation system with a minimum follow-up of 2 years in the Asian population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective comparative study of 33 rTSAs with the navigation system (NAV group) and 40 conventional rTSAs (CON group). Radiologic measurements regarding the position of the glenoid component, glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, and scapular notching, as well as clinical outcomes including range of motion, functional scores, and complications were compared. Number, length, and angulation of screws were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age was 73.9 ± 5.9 years with a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 6.4 months. The NAV group more frequently utilized augmented baseplate (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), showed less superior inclination (<em>P</em> = .030) and had lower incidence of glenoid vault perforation (<em>P</em> = .040). The length of superior (<em>P</em> = .001) and inferior screws (<em>P</em> = .045) was longer in the NAV group. In the NAV group compared to the CON group, more inferior orientation of superior screws (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), more anterior orientation for inferior screws (<em>P</em> = .031), and anterior screws (<em>P</em> = .003) were observed. The NAV group showed significantly less penetration into the suprascapular fossa by a superior screw (<em>P</em> = .007). Final range of motion, functional scores, and complications showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the short-term follow-up, the use of a navigation system in rTSA showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes and complications compared to conventional implantation. However, it enabled a lower superior inclination and a reduced glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, simultaneously allowing for the insertion of longer peripheral screws in a safer direction compared to conventional implantation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 422-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In reverse total arthroplasty (rTSA), glenoid component positioning is a critical factor for outcomes especially in Asian populations with smaller glenoids. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of rTSA with and without the navigation system with a minimum follow-up of 2 years in the Asian population.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative study of 33 rTSAs with the navigation system (NAV group) and 40 conventional rTSAs (CON group). Radiologic measurements regarding the position of the glenoid component, glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, and scapular notching, as well as clinical outcomes including range of motion, functional scores, and complications were compared. Number, length, and angulation of screws were assessed.

Results

The mean age was 73.9 ± 5.9 years with a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 6.4 months. The NAV group more frequently utilized augmented baseplate (P < .001), showed less superior inclination (P = .030) and had lower incidence of glenoid vault perforation (P = .040). The length of superior (P = .001) and inferior screws (P = .045) was longer in the NAV group. In the NAV group compared to the CON group, more inferior orientation of superior screws (P < .001), more anterior orientation for inferior screws (P = .031), and anterior screws (P = .003) were observed. The NAV group showed significantly less penetration into the suprascapular fossa by a superior screw (P = .007). Final range of motion, functional scores, and complications showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

In the short-term follow-up, the use of a navigation system in rTSA showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes and complications compared to conventional implantation. However, it enabled a lower superior inclination and a reduced glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, simultaneously allowing for the insertion of longer peripheral screws in a safer direction compared to conventional implantation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信