Cemented vs. cementless stems for reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a registry analysis with patient-reported outcomes from a level 1 trauma centre

Q2 Medicine
Kyle Raubenheimer MD , Mitchell Atkinson MBBS , Matthew Yan MB BChir, MA(Cantab) , Michael Perret MBBS(Hons), FRACS , Stefan Bauer MD , Dylan Harries BSc (Hons), PhD , David R.J. Gill MB ChB, FRACS, FAOrthA , William G. Blakeney MBBS, MS, MSc, FRACS
{"title":"Cemented vs. cementless stems for reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a registry analysis with patient-reported outcomes from a level 1 trauma centre","authors":"Kyle Raubenheimer MD ,&nbsp;Mitchell Atkinson MBBS ,&nbsp;Matthew Yan MB BChir, MA(Cantab) ,&nbsp;Michael Perret MBBS(Hons), FRACS ,&nbsp;Stefan Bauer MD ,&nbsp;Dylan Harries BSc (Hons), PhD ,&nbsp;David R.J. Gill MB ChB, FRACS, FAOrthA ,&nbsp;William G. Blakeney MBBS, MS, MSc, FRACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is being increasingly used in the treatment of comminuted or unreconstructible proximal humerus fractures. It is currently unclear if cementless rTSA have equivocal revision rates, mortality, and functional outcomes compared to cemented or cementless rTSA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two data sources were used for this study. All rTSA performed for proximal humerus fractures between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020 recorded on the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry were used to determine revision rate and mortality between cemented and cementless rTSA. Patient-reported outcome measurements, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and single assessment numerical value were obtained via telephone from Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) patients between 01 January 2010 and 10 February 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 83 patients who underwent rTSA for proximal humerus fractures at RPH. There were 4335 rTSA procedures identified at other hospitals nationally. Of these, 54% of rTSA used cementless humeral stems. There was no significant difference in revision rate or mortality between cemented and cementless humeral stems adjusted for age and gender. For the RPH cohort, patient-reported outcome measurements scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 65.9 (CI: 60.6-71.2), Oxford Shoulder Score of 34.6 (CI: 31.9-37.2), and single assessment numerical value of 68.8 (CI: 61.8-75.8).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Revision rates and mortality are similar between cemented and cementless humeral stems used for rTSA for proximal humerus fractures. For appropriate patients, cementless humeral stems may be an acceptable first-line treatment for proximal humerus fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 415-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is being increasingly used in the treatment of comminuted or unreconstructible proximal humerus fractures. It is currently unclear if cementless rTSA have equivocal revision rates, mortality, and functional outcomes compared to cemented or cementless rTSA.

Methods

Two data sources were used for this study. All rTSA performed for proximal humerus fractures between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020 recorded on the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry were used to determine revision rate and mortality between cemented and cementless rTSA. Patient-reported outcome measurements, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and single assessment numerical value were obtained via telephone from Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) patients between 01 January 2010 and 10 February 2021.

Results

The study included 83 patients who underwent rTSA for proximal humerus fractures at RPH. There were 4335 rTSA procedures identified at other hospitals nationally. Of these, 54% of rTSA used cementless humeral stems. There was no significant difference in revision rate or mortality between cemented and cementless humeral stems adjusted for age and gender. For the RPH cohort, patient-reported outcome measurements scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 65.9 (CI: 60.6-71.2), Oxford Shoulder Score of 34.6 (CI: 31.9-37.2), and single assessment numerical value of 68.8 (CI: 61.8-75.8).

Conclusion

Revision rates and mortality are similar between cemented and cementless humeral stems used for rTSA for proximal humerus fractures. For appropriate patients, cementless humeral stems may be an acceptable first-line treatment for proximal humerus fractures.
肱骨近端骨折逆行肩关节置换术采用骨水泥与无骨水泥假体:来自1级创伤中心的患者报告结果的登记分析
背景:反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)越来越多地用于治疗粉碎性或不可重建的肱骨近端骨折。目前尚不清楚与骨水泥或无骨水泥rTSA相比,无骨水泥rTSA是否有模棱两可的翻修率、死亡率和功能结局。方法本研究采用两个数据来源。2010年1月1日至2020年1月1日期间为肱骨近端骨折进行的所有rTSA均记录在澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换术登记处,用于确定骨水泥和无骨水泥rTSA的翻修率和死亡率。2010年1月1日至2021年2月10日期间,通过电话从皇家珀斯医院(RPH)患者获得患者报告的结果测量,包括美国肩关节外科医生评分、牛津肩关节评分和单一评估数值。结果本研究纳入了83例肱骨近端RPH骨折的rTSA患者。全国其他医院共发现了4335个rTSA程序。其中,54%的rTSA使用无骨水泥肱骨干。经年龄和性别调整后,骨水泥和非骨水泥肱骨干的翻修率和死亡率无显著差异。对于RPH队列,患者报告的结果测量评分包括American Shoulder and肘部外科医生评分65.9 (CI: 60.6-71.2), Oxford肩部评分34.6 (CI: 31.9-37.2),单一评估数值68.8 (CI: 61.8-75.8)。结论肱骨近端骨折rTSA采用骨水泥与非骨水泥肱骨干的修复率和死亡率相似。对于合适的患者,无骨水泥肱骨干可能是肱骨近端骨折的可接受的一线治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信