A comparative analysis of short-term results in range of motion following arthroscopic arthrolysis with vs. without peripheral nerve block in cases of elbow stiffness

Q2 Medicine
Tamara Babasiz MD, Michael Hackl MD, Felix Krane MD, Lars P. Müller MD, Tim Leschinger MD
{"title":"A comparative analysis of short-term results in range of motion following arthroscopic arthrolysis with vs. without peripheral nerve block in cases of elbow stiffness","authors":"Tamara Babasiz MD,&nbsp;Michael Hackl MD,&nbsp;Felix Krane MD,&nbsp;Lars P. Müller MD,&nbsp;Tim Leschinger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the clinical short-term results in patients with elbow stiffness, particularly focusing on the range of motion (ROM) following arthroscopic arthrolysis. Our objective was to assess potential differences in postoperative outcomes between patients who received an additional peripheral nerve block with postoperative nerve block catheter, and those who exclusively underwent general anesthesia at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center study was performed on patients undergoing arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis due to persistent elbow stiffness between 2014 and 2018. The participants were divided into 2 cohorts: One underwent arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis with an additional peripheral nerve block, combined with a postoperative nerve block catheter (group 1), while the other received the procedure without peripheral nerve block (group 2). Standardized assessments of ROM and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score were conducted and analyzed preoperatively and at the 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 32 patients were included in this study. In group 1 (18 patients), ROM in extension/flexion improved significantly from 95° (±27.17) to 124.4° (±12.7°; <em>P</em> = .000012) after 6 months. Similarly, a significant improvement from 150° (±29.1) to 170.6° (±13°; <em>P</em> = .0013) was observed after 6 months for ROM in pronation/supination. In contrast, group 2 (14 patients) demonstrated an improvement in elbow motion after 6 months, compared to preoperative values, although this increase did not reach statistical significance after 6 months (ROM extension/flexion, <em>P</em> = .6016; ROM pronation/supination, <em>P</em> = .2461). Furthermore, a significant difference (<em>P</em> = .0199) in the delta values of ROM arc for extension/flexion before surgery and after 6 months was identified when comparing both groups, favoring the patient group with additional regional anesthesia (group 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Additional peripheral nerve block combined with a postoperative nerve block catheter in arthroscopic arthrolysis in cases of elbow stiffness may be an opportunity to enhance postoperative outcomes by achieving better functional ROM, perhaps through reduced postoperative pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 568-573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the clinical short-term results in patients with elbow stiffness, particularly focusing on the range of motion (ROM) following arthroscopic arthrolysis. Our objective was to assess potential differences in postoperative outcomes between patients who received an additional peripheral nerve block with postoperative nerve block catheter, and those who exclusively underwent general anesthesia at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.

Methods

A single-center study was performed on patients undergoing arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis due to persistent elbow stiffness between 2014 and 2018. The participants were divided into 2 cohorts: One underwent arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis with an additional peripheral nerve block, combined with a postoperative nerve block catheter (group 1), while the other received the procedure without peripheral nerve block (group 2). Standardized assessments of ROM and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score were conducted and analyzed preoperatively and at the 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included in this study. In group 1 (18 patients), ROM in extension/flexion improved significantly from 95° (±27.17) to 124.4° (±12.7°; P = .000012) after 6 months. Similarly, a significant improvement from 150° (±29.1) to 170.6° (±13°; P = .0013) was observed after 6 months for ROM in pronation/supination. In contrast, group 2 (14 patients) demonstrated an improvement in elbow motion after 6 months, compared to preoperative values, although this increase did not reach statistical significance after 6 months (ROM extension/flexion, P = .6016; ROM pronation/supination, P = .2461). Furthermore, a significant difference (P = .0199) in the delta values of ROM arc for extension/flexion before surgery and after 6 months was identified when comparing both groups, favoring the patient group with additional regional anesthesia (group 1).

Conclusion

Additional peripheral nerve block combined with a postoperative nerve block catheter in arthroscopic arthrolysis in cases of elbow stiffness may be an opportunity to enhance postoperative outcomes by achieving better functional ROM, perhaps through reduced postoperative pain.
关节镜下关节松解伴与不伴周围神经阻滞治疗肘关节僵硬患者活动范围短期结果的比较分析
本研究旨在探讨肘关节僵硬患者的临床短期结果,特别关注关节镜下关节松解后的活动范围(ROM)。我们的目的是评估在术后6周、3个月和6个月接受额外周围神经阻滞和术后神经阻滞导管的患者与完全接受全身麻醉的患者之间的术后结局的潜在差异。方法对2014 - 2018年因肘关节持续僵硬而行关节镜下肘关节松解术的患者进行单中心研究。参与者被分为两组:一组接受关节镜下肘关节松解术,外加外周神经阻滞,并联合术后神经阻滞导管(第一组),另一组接受不外周神经阻滞的手术(第二组)。术前、6周、3个月和6个月随访时,对ROM和手臂、肩部和手部残疾进行标准化评估和分析。结果本研究共纳入32例患者。在组1(18例)中,伸展/屈曲的ROM从95°(±27.17)显著改善到124.4°(±12.7);P = .000012)。同样,从150°(±29.1)到170.6°(±13°;P = 0.0013) 6个月后观察到旋前/旋后ROM。相比之下,第2组(14例)在6个月后肘关节活动与术前相比有所改善,尽管6个月后这种增加没有达到统计学意义(ROM伸展/屈曲,P = .6016;ROM旋前/旋后,P = .2461)。此外,在比较两组患者术前和术后6个月的伸展/屈曲活动活动度的δ值时,发现了显著差异(P = 0.0199),这表明患者组更倾向于额外区域麻醉(组1)。结论在关节镜下关节松解术中,肘关节僵硬的病例中,额外周围神经阻滞联合术后神经阻滞导管可能是通过获得更好的功能性活动活动度来提高术后疗效的机会。也许是通过减少术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信