Long-term results of open extensive débridement arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: what direct examination and computed tomography images revealed

Q2 Medicine
Shuzo Morita MD, PhD , Naoki Suenaga MD, PhD , Naomi Oizumi MD, PhD , Kazuya Inoue MD, PhD , Yasuhito Tanaka MD, PhD
{"title":"Long-term results of open extensive débridement arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: what direct examination and computed tomography images revealed","authors":"Shuzo Morita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Naoki Suenaga MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Naomi Oizumi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kazuya Inoue MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yasuhito Tanaka MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although open and arthroscopic débridement arthroplasties are major surgical strategies in patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, the long-term results remain inadequately studied. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic results after extensive débridement arthroplasty (EDA) for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eleven patients with primary osteoarthritis treated with EDA were able to be retrospectively evaluated by direct examination. The mean age of the seven male and four female patients was 56 years (range, 47-74 years). The surgical procedure involved the removal of all osteophytes and free bodies, release of anterior and posterior capsules, fenestration of the olecranon fossa, and excision of the posterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament. At a mean follow-up of 15 years, clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean flexion increased significantly from 110.5° to 129.6° postoperatively in the short term and was generally maintained at the final follow-up. Conversely, the mean extension improved significantly from −26.4° to −11.4° postoperatively in the short term; however, at the final examination, it had decreased to −25.5°. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance score, results were excellent for five elbows, good for five, and fair for one. In all cases, postoperative pain was “none” or “mild,” and no postoperative complications were observed. In all cases, recurrence of osteophytes was seen, and the fenestration hole of the olecranon fossa remained open in three elbows, was partially refilled in four elbows and was completely refilled in four elbows at the time of the final follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that among preoperative variables, age, arc of motion, and extension were prognostic factors that significantly affected postoperative extension in the long term.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The present findings indicate that EDA provides marked long-term relief of pain and improved flexion despite the recurrence of restricted extension. Patients with extremely restricted extension preoperatively are at the risk of deteriorated extension over the long term.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 596-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although open and arthroscopic débridement arthroplasties are major surgical strategies in patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, the long-term results remain inadequately studied. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic results after extensive débridement arthroplasty (EDA) for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow.

Methods

Eleven patients with primary osteoarthritis treated with EDA were able to be retrospectively evaluated by direct examination. The mean age of the seven male and four female patients was 56 years (range, 47-74 years). The surgical procedure involved the removal of all osteophytes and free bodies, release of anterior and posterior capsules, fenestration of the olecranon fossa, and excision of the posterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament. At a mean follow-up of 15 years, clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed.

Results

The mean flexion increased significantly from 110.5° to 129.6° postoperatively in the short term and was generally maintained at the final follow-up. Conversely, the mean extension improved significantly from −26.4° to −11.4° postoperatively in the short term; however, at the final examination, it had decreased to −25.5°. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance score, results were excellent for five elbows, good for five, and fair for one. In all cases, postoperative pain was “none” or “mild,” and no postoperative complications were observed. In all cases, recurrence of osteophytes was seen, and the fenestration hole of the olecranon fossa remained open in three elbows, was partially refilled in four elbows and was completely refilled in four elbows at the time of the final follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that among preoperative variables, age, arc of motion, and extension were prognostic factors that significantly affected postoperative extension in the long term.

Conclusions

The present findings indicate that EDA provides marked long-term relief of pain and improved flexion despite the recurrence of restricted extension. Patients with extremely restricted extension preoperatively are at the risk of deteriorated extension over the long term.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信