Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Argentine version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with shoulder disorders

Q2 Medicine
Juan C. Porollan PT , Santiago Soliño PT , Franco J. Fabani PT , María G. de Ilzarbe PT , Micaela Oyola PT , Tomás A. Bossio PT , Julián M. Morales PT , Joaquín López PT , Federico J. Villalba PT , Gastón Muhafara PT , Pablo O. Policastro PT
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Argentine version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with shoulder disorders","authors":"Juan C. Porollan PT ,&nbsp;Santiago Soliño PT ,&nbsp;Franco J. Fabani PT ,&nbsp;María G. de Ilzarbe PT ,&nbsp;Micaela Oyola PT ,&nbsp;Tomás A. Bossio PT ,&nbsp;Julián M. Morales PT ,&nbsp;Joaquín López PT ,&nbsp;Federico J. Villalba PT ,&nbsp;Gastón Muhafara PT ,&nbsp;Pablo O. Policastro PT","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Shoulder disorders are some of the leading causes of musculoskeletal conditions with a significant economic impact worldwide. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire has proved to be a valid and useful tool for the assessment of disability; however, reporting of properties in several languages has been inconsistent, and the quality of the studies available is low. Moreover, there is only one version in Spanish, designed in Spain, which does not consider the linguistic differences existing in Argentina. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct the cross-cultural adaptation of the SPADI and assess its reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability in subjects with shoulder disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The study was conducted following the COSMIN Guidelines (COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments). We included Argentine residents, older than 18 years of age, referred to physiotherapy for shoulder disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 101 patients were evaluated. Reliability was acceptable with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 2.18 and 6.05, respectively. Construct validity was excellent, and responsiveness was high. Also, the minimal clinically important difference was 18.46 points, the substantial clinical benefit was 27.69 points, and the symptom acceptable level value was 21.35 points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A cross-cultural adaptation of the Argentine version of the SPADI was conducted. This version proved to be valid, reliable, and responsive with interpretability values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 532-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Shoulder disorders are some of the leading causes of musculoskeletal conditions with a significant economic impact worldwide. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire has proved to be a valid and useful tool for the assessment of disability; however, reporting of properties in several languages has been inconsistent, and the quality of the studies available is low. Moreover, there is only one version in Spanish, designed in Spain, which does not consider the linguistic differences existing in Argentina. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct the cross-cultural adaptation of the SPADI and assess its reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability in subjects with shoulder disorders.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted following the COSMIN Guidelines (COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments). We included Argentine residents, older than 18 years of age, referred to physiotherapy for shoulder disorders.

Results

A total of 101 patients were evaluated. Reliability was acceptable with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 2.18 and 6.05, respectively. Construct validity was excellent, and responsiveness was high. Also, the minimal clinically important difference was 18.46 points, the substantial clinical benefit was 27.69 points, and the symptom acceptable level value was 21.35 points.

Conclusion

A cross-cultural adaptation of the Argentine version of the SPADI was conducted. This version proved to be valid, reliable, and responsive with interpretability values.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信