{"title":"Efficiency of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks for breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Aline Albi-Feldzer , Guillaume Gayraud , Sylvain Dureau , Marion Augé , Adrien Lemoine , Julien Raft","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks are fascial plane blocks that are used during anterolateral superficial chest wall surgery. However, the true analgesic efficacy of these blocks in oncological breast surgery is unclear because of the diversity of breast-surgery procedures. The primary hypothesis of this study was that these blocks reduce the incidence of acute pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled study included 185 patients. Patients were randomized equally into two groups at a 1:1 ratio according to the type of interfascial injection received (ropivacaine vs. saline). The incidence of analgesic rescue during the first 3 postoperative hours was the primary outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The authors enrolled 182 women. The analgesic rescue incidence was lower in the ropivacaine group. Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine had an incidence of analgesic rescue of 43 % (<em>n</em> = 37) versus 61 % (<em>n</em> = 50) in patients given the placebo (relative risk = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.52 to 0.94; <em>p</em> = 0.02). Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine are associated with a 30 % reduction in the use of rescue analgesics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks reduced the incidence of analgesic rescue and reduced the postoperative pain score to the mild range after oncological breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph-node biopsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 111805"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000650","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks are fascial plane blocks that are used during anterolateral superficial chest wall surgery. However, the true analgesic efficacy of these blocks in oncological breast surgery is unclear because of the diversity of breast-surgery procedures. The primary hypothesis of this study was that these blocks reduce the incidence of acute pain.
Methods
This double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled study included 185 patients. Patients were randomized equally into two groups at a 1:1 ratio according to the type of interfascial injection received (ropivacaine vs. saline). The incidence of analgesic rescue during the first 3 postoperative hours was the primary outcome measure.
Results
The authors enrolled 182 women. The analgesic rescue incidence was lower in the ropivacaine group. Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine had an incidence of analgesic rescue of 43 % (n = 37) versus 61 % (n = 50) in patients given the placebo (relative risk = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.52 to 0.94; p = 0.02). Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine are associated with a 30 % reduction in the use of rescue analgesics.
Conclusions
Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks reduced the incidence of analgesic rescue and reduced the postoperative pain score to the mild range after oncological breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph-node biopsy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.