Evaluating proximal ulnar morphology in relation to the humeral flexion–extension axis

Q2 Medicine
Cornille Minnaert MD , Jan Herregodts MD , Stijn Herregodts Jr. PhD , Lieven De Wilde MD, PhD , Alexander Van Tongel MD, PhD
{"title":"Evaluating proximal ulnar morphology in relation to the humeral flexion–extension axis","authors":"Cornille Minnaert MD ,&nbsp;Jan Herregodts MD ,&nbsp;Stijn Herregodts Jr. PhD ,&nbsp;Lieven De Wilde MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander Van Tongel MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The study aimed to evaluate the 3D relationship between the plane of the posterior surface of the olecranon, a newly defined plane through the ridge of the greater sigmoid notch (GSN), and the ulno-humeral flexion–extension axis (FE axis), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-four healthy left elbows were computed tomography scanned and 3D-segmented. First, a Cartesian ulnar coordinate system (UCS) was determined. Next, several anatomical landmarks were identified. The UCS and landmarks were assessed for repeatability and reproducibility. The orientation of the posterior surface and the plane through the GSN was evaluated relative to the anatomical FE axis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both the UCS and the landmarks were considered repeatable and reproducible. In the axial plane, the mean angle between the posterior surface and the FE axis was 3° (standard deviation: ±5°, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [−6°; 12°]) external rotation. The mean axial angle between the GSN and the FE axis was 88° (standard deviation: ±3°, 95% CI: [83°; 94°]) external rotation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study concludes that the angulation between the posterior plane surface and the FE axis is highly variable (95% CI range: 18°). The plane through the ridge of the GSN of a healthy proximal ulna could provide a more reliable anatomical landmark to estimate the position of the elbow FE axis compared to the posterior surface (95% CI range: 11°).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 574-579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The study aimed to evaluate the 3D relationship between the plane of the posterior surface of the olecranon, a newly defined plane through the ridge of the greater sigmoid notch (GSN), and the ulno-humeral flexion–extension axis (FE axis), respectively.

Methods

Twenty-four healthy left elbows were computed tomography scanned and 3D-segmented. First, a Cartesian ulnar coordinate system (UCS) was determined. Next, several anatomical landmarks were identified. The UCS and landmarks were assessed for repeatability and reproducibility. The orientation of the posterior surface and the plane through the GSN was evaluated relative to the anatomical FE axis.

Results

Both the UCS and the landmarks were considered repeatable and reproducible. In the axial plane, the mean angle between the posterior surface and the FE axis was 3° (standard deviation: ±5°, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [−6°; 12°]) external rotation. The mean axial angle between the GSN and the FE axis was 88° (standard deviation: ±3°, 95% CI: [83°; 94°]) external rotation.

Conclusion

This study concludes that the angulation between the posterior plane surface and the FE axis is highly variable (95% CI range: 18°). The plane through the ridge of the GSN of a healthy proximal ulna could provide a more reliable anatomical landmark to estimate the position of the elbow FE axis compared to the posterior surface (95% CI range: 11°).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信