Reflective journaling on suicide and self-harm related online use: An intervention approach for reducing online harm and mental health impact

Q2 Medicine
Lucy Biddle , Laura Kennedy , Lydia Grace , Jane Derges , Zoë Haime
{"title":"Reflective journaling on suicide and self-harm related online use: An intervention approach for reducing online harm and mental health impact","authors":"Lucy Biddle ,&nbsp;Laura Kennedy ,&nbsp;Lydia Grace ,&nbsp;Jane Derges ,&nbsp;Zoë Haime","doi":"10.1016/j.mhp.2025.200412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Self-harm and suicide-related online use can bring harms and benefits for users. Research suggests a need to improve user metacognition around online engagement to manage these conflicting effects, but behavioural interventions to achieve this are lacking. We aimed to analyse data from a 6-month longitudinal qualitative study, in which participants journalled about their self-harm and suicide-related online use as part of the study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were interviewed at three timepoints (<em>n</em> = 9 participants, 25 interviews) and completed a daily reflective diary between interviews. Experiences of diary use were explored qualitatively during interviews and in free-text diary entries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All participants derived benefits from journalling about their engagements with self-harm and suicide-related online content, such as increased insight about the nature and impact of their online use. Some in turn reported positive behaviour changes. However, daily completion was burdensome and some participants reported potential costs, including increased attention to self-harm content.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Journalling about online activity should be explored as potential individual-level intervention to tackle harmful online use and reduce linked mental health morbidity, both within and outside of clinical setting. Co-designed research with lived-experience users and practitioners will be essential for maximising safety and likely success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55864,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Prevention","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 200412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657025000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Self-harm and suicide-related online use can bring harms and benefits for users. Research suggests a need to improve user metacognition around online engagement to manage these conflicting effects, but behavioural interventions to achieve this are lacking. We aimed to analyse data from a 6-month longitudinal qualitative study, in which participants journalled about their self-harm and suicide-related online use as part of the study.

Methods

Participants were interviewed at three timepoints (n = 9 participants, 25 interviews) and completed a daily reflective diary between interviews. Experiences of diary use were explored qualitatively during interviews and in free-text diary entries.

Results

All participants derived benefits from journalling about their engagements with self-harm and suicide-related online content, such as increased insight about the nature and impact of their online use. Some in turn reported positive behaviour changes. However, daily completion was burdensome and some participants reported potential costs, including increased attention to self-harm content.

Conclusions

Journalling about online activity should be explored as potential individual-level intervention to tackle harmful online use and reduce linked mental health morbidity, both within and outside of clinical setting. Co-designed research with lived-experience users and practitioners will be essential for maximising safety and likely success.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mental Health and Prevention
Mental Health and Prevention Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信