Factors associated with accuracy of rapid HIV test performance in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Southern African journal of HIV medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajhivmed.v26i1.1641
Amanda A Mohlala, Edith Phalane, Claris Siyamayambo, Musa Jaiteh, Refilwe N Phaswana-Mafuya
{"title":"Factors associated with accuracy of rapid HIV test performance in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.","authors":"Amanda A Mohlala, Edith Phalane, Claris Siyamayambo, Musa Jaiteh, Refilwe N Phaswana-Mafuya","doi":"10.4102/sajhivmed.v26i1.1641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing for HIV using rapid test devices assists in determining HIV status and ascertains if treatment is required. Rapid HIV quality assurance (QA) training is conducted to ensure accuracy of test results in non-laboratory settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the factors associated with the accuracy of rapid HIV testing among primary healthcare (PHC) workers who received HIV testing QA training in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical study design was used to purposively recruit 167 PHC workers with prior training on HIV testing QA. Data were collected in 2022 using a self-administered questionnaire. STATA version 17.0 was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tester accuracy measured by a proficiency testing (PT) score of greater than 80% was achieved among 64.7% of the testers. Comprehensive HIV QA training was significantly associated with a PT score of greater than 80% (<i>P</i> = 0.001). On multivariable analyses, a PT score of greater than 80% was less likely with rural facilities (adjusted odd ratios [aOR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.92, <i>P</i> = 0.020), Grade 12 education (aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19-0.85, <i>P</i> = 0.017), mentorship (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85, <i>P</i> = 0.008), and attitudes towards inaccurate HIV results (aOR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.82, <i>P</i> = 0.03); while implementation of QA processes (aOR = 3.94, 95% CI: 1.22-12.74, <i>P</i> = 0.022) and elements of QA in the HIV Testing Services register (aOR = 4.93, 95% CI: 1.45-16.74, <i>P</i> = 0.011) were associated with a PT score of greater than 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to comprehensive rapid HIV QA training were associated with higher tester accuracy. A framework for QA training is required for standardisation of training in the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":94212,"journal":{"name":"Southern African journal of HIV medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"1641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African journal of HIV medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v26i1.1641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Testing for HIV using rapid test devices assists in determining HIV status and ascertains if treatment is required. Rapid HIV quality assurance (QA) training is conducted to ensure accuracy of test results in non-laboratory settings.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the factors associated with the accuracy of rapid HIV testing among primary healthcare (PHC) workers who received HIV testing QA training in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Method: A cross-sectional analytical study design was used to purposively recruit 167 PHC workers with prior training on HIV testing QA. Data were collected in 2022 using a self-administered questionnaire. STATA version 17.0 was used for data analysis.

Results: Tester accuracy measured by a proficiency testing (PT) score of greater than 80% was achieved among 64.7% of the testers. Comprehensive HIV QA training was significantly associated with a PT score of greater than 80% (P = 0.001). On multivariable analyses, a PT score of greater than 80% was less likely with rural facilities (adjusted odd ratios [aOR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.92, P = 0.020), Grade 12 education (aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19-0.85, P = 0.017), mentorship (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85, P = 0.008), and attitudes towards inaccurate HIV results (aOR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.82, P = 0.03); while implementation of QA processes (aOR = 3.94, 95% CI: 1.22-12.74, P = 0.022) and elements of QA in the HIV Testing Services register (aOR = 4.93, 95% CI: 1.45-16.74, P = 0.011) were associated with a PT score of greater than 80%.

Conclusion: Exposure to comprehensive rapid HIV QA training were associated with higher tester accuracy. A framework for QA training is required for standardisation of training in the country.

与南非东开普省艾滋病毒快速检测准确性相关的因素。
背景:使用快速检测设备检测HIV有助于确定HIV状态并确定是否需要治疗。开展快速艾滋病毒质量保证培训,以确保在非实验室环境中检测结果的准确性。目的:本研究旨在确定在南非东开普省接受HIV检测QA培训的初级卫生保健(PHC)工作人员中与快速HIV检测准确性相关的因素。方法:采用横断面分析研究设计,有目的地招募167名接受过HIV检测QA培训的初级保健工作者。数据是在2022年通过一份自我管理的问卷收集的。采用STATA 17.0版本进行数据分析。结果:64.7%的测试人员达到了熟练测试(PT)分数大于80%的测试人员准确性。综合HIV QA培训与PT评分大于80%显著相关(P = 0.001)。在多变量分析中,农村设施(调整奇数比[aOR] = 0.56, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.36-0.92, P = 0.020)、12年级教育(aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19-0.85, P = 0.017)、指导(aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85, P = 0.008)和对不准确艾滋病毒检测结果的态度(aOR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.82, P = 0.03)不太可能出现PT得分超过80%;而质量保证过程的实施(aOR = 3.94, 95% CI: 1.22-12.74, P = 0.022)和艾滋病毒检测服务登记处的质量保证要素(aOR = 4.93, 95% CI: 1.45-16.74, P = 0.011)与PT评分大于80%相关。结论:接受全面的HIV快速QA培训可提高检测准确率。为了使该国的培训标准化,需要一个质量保证培训框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信