The effect of the pandemic on autoantibody rates in the general population.

IF 1.1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Archives of rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10330
Mehmet Karabey, Havva Kaya, Alperen Ceylan, Kadir Kaba, Mehmet Özdemir, Bahadır Feyzioğlu
{"title":"The effect of the pandemic on autoantibody rates in the general population.","authors":"Mehmet Karabey, Havva Kaya, Alperen Ceylan, Kadir Kaba, Mehmet Özdemir, Bahadır Feyzioğlu","doi":"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the possible effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on autoantibodies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Samples of 89,108 individuals (29,033 males, 60,075 females; median: 36 years; range, 0 to 96 years) who underwent autoimmune testing between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The prepandemic period was defined as May 1, 2017, to March 20, 2020, while the pandemic period was defined as March 20, 2020, to May 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 0.55% were of foreign nationality. The positivity rate was 18.12%. Autoantibody positivity rates, when analyzed by sex, were higher in females for antinuclear antibody (ANA), antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), anti-liver kidney microsomal (LKM) antibody, immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-gliadin antibody, anti-endomysial antibody A, anti-ribosomal P protein antibody, anti-Sjögren's syndrome A (anti-SSA), anti-Sjögren's syndrome B (anti-SSB), anti-Smith/ribonucleoprotein (anti-SM/RNP), anti-SM, and c-ANCA (cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody). When the prepandemic period was compared with the pandemic period, AMA, anti-LKM antibody, IgA anti-gliadin antibody, anti-endomysial antibody A, and anti-SM/RNP levels were higher in the prepandemic period, while ANA was higher during the pandemic. Additionally, statistically significant differences were found in the distributions of ANA, AMA, anti-LKM antibody, IgA anti-gliadin antibody, anti-endomysial antibody A, anti-ribosomal P protein antibody, anti-SM, anti-SSA, and c-ANCA across the years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study could not establish a cause-effect relationship between the changing autoantibody levels during the COVID-19 pandemic and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection due to the lack of results from the same patients across different periods. Nonetheless, we believe the quantitative seroprevalence changes in such a large sample of autoantibody screening results over a five-year period, including the pandemic, are valuable.</p>","PeriodicalId":93884,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":"39 4","pages":"541-548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the possible effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on autoantibodies.

Patients and methods: Samples of 89,108 individuals (29,033 males, 60,075 females; median: 36 years; range, 0 to 96 years) who underwent autoimmune testing between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The prepandemic period was defined as May 1, 2017, to March 20, 2020, while the pandemic period was defined as March 20, 2020, to May 31, 2022.

Results: Of the participants, 0.55% were of foreign nationality. The positivity rate was 18.12%. Autoantibody positivity rates, when analyzed by sex, were higher in females for antinuclear antibody (ANA), antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), anti-liver kidney microsomal (LKM) antibody, immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-gliadin antibody, anti-endomysial antibody A, anti-ribosomal P protein antibody, anti-Sjögren's syndrome A (anti-SSA), anti-Sjögren's syndrome B (anti-SSB), anti-Smith/ribonucleoprotein (anti-SM/RNP), anti-SM, and c-ANCA (cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody). When the prepandemic period was compared with the pandemic period, AMA, anti-LKM antibody, IgA anti-gliadin antibody, anti-endomysial antibody A, and anti-SM/RNP levels were higher in the prepandemic period, while ANA was higher during the pandemic. Additionally, statistically significant differences were found in the distributions of ANA, AMA, anti-LKM antibody, IgA anti-gliadin antibody, anti-endomysial antibody A, anti-ribosomal P protein antibody, anti-SM, anti-SSA, and c-ANCA across the years.

Conclusion: This study could not establish a cause-effect relationship between the changing autoantibody levels during the COVID-19 pandemic and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection due to the lack of results from the same patients across different periods. Nonetheless, we believe the quantitative seroprevalence changes in such a large sample of autoantibody screening results over a five-year period, including the pandemic, are valuable.

目的:探讨2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对自身抗体的可能影响。患者和方法:样本89,108人(男性29,033人,女性60075人;中位数:36岁;对2017年1月至2022年5月期间接受自身免疫检测的患者进行回顾性分析。大流行前期定义为2017年5月1日至2020年3月20日,大流行期定义为2020年3月20日至2022年5月31日。结果:参与者中有0.55%为外籍人士。阳性率为18.12%。按性别分析,女性的自身抗体阳性率较高,抗核抗体(ANA)、抗线粒体抗体(AMA)、抗肝肾微粒体(LKM)抗体、免疫球蛋白A (IgA)抗麦胶蛋白抗体、抗肌内膜抗体A、抗核糖体P蛋白抗体、anti-Sjögren's综合征A(抗ssa)、anti-Sjögren's综合征B(抗ssb)、抗史密斯/核糖核蛋白(抗sm /RNP)、抗sm和c-ANCA(细胞质抗中性粒细胞细胞质抗体)。与大流行期比较,AMA、抗lkm抗体、IgA抗麦胶蛋白抗体、抗肌内膜抗体A、抗sm /RNP水平在大流行前较高,ANA在大流行期间较高。ANA、AMA、抗lkm抗体、IgA抗麦胶蛋白抗体、抗肌内膜抗体A、抗核糖体P蛋白抗体、抗sm、抗ssa、c-ANCA的年际分布差异有统计学意义。结论:由于缺乏同一患者不同时期的结果,本研究无法建立COVID-19大流行期间自身抗体水平变化与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型感染之间的因果关系。尽管如此,我们认为,在包括大流行在内的5年期间,如此大样本的自身抗体筛查结果的定量血清阳性率变化是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信