Clinical Evaluation of the Heparin Therapeutic Window Using Activated Clotting Time in Neurological Interventional Radiology at an Academic Medical Center.

Melody B Nelson, Amitava Dasgupta, X Long Zheng
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of the Heparin Therapeutic Window Using Activated Clotting Time in Neurological Interventional Radiology at an Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Melody B Nelson, Amitava Dasgupta, X Long Zheng","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0399-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Activated clotting time (ACT) is useful for monitoring heparin therapy in neurointerventional radiology (NIR). We previously used the Hemochron Signature Elite instrument for measuring ACT in NIR.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the suitability of measuring ACT using i-STAT in NIR by comparing its performance with Hemochron and a laboratory-based anti-Xa (anti-factor Xa) assay.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>All ACT measurements were performed in duplicate, using 2 Hemochron and 2 i-STAT devices in 53 samples from 15 unique multidose heparin administrations in NIR procedures and 110 samples in cardiovascular procedures. Samples were tested simultaneously within 1 minute of each other.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>For 12 of the 15 procedures in NIR, anti-Xa was assessed at the beginning of the procedure and at the end of all procedural dosing. We also reviewed the patient's charts anonymously for any indication of postprocedural neurological bleeding. Interinstrument variability was much higher with Hemochron than with i-STAT. We also observed lower ACT values with i-STAT than with Hemochron. Therefore, the historical ACT range of 250 to 300 seconds for Hemochron was revised to 200 to 250 seconds for i-STAT devices. In the therapeutic window for anti-Xa, ACT results from both instruments exhibited a linear correlation. However, at supratherapeutic range for anti-Xa, ACT results from Hemochron exhibited more linear correlation, while i-STAT ACT demonstrated a plateau effect. No patient had any evidence of severe postprocedural neurological bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The i-STAT analyzers produce more reproducible ACT results, but the target range should be lowered to 200 to 250 seconds. This range appears to provide adequate and safe heparin therapy, confirmed by anti-Xa assay results and clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0399-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Activated clotting time (ACT) is useful for monitoring heparin therapy in neurointerventional radiology (NIR). We previously used the Hemochron Signature Elite instrument for measuring ACT in NIR.

Objective.—: To evaluate the suitability of measuring ACT using i-STAT in NIR by comparing its performance with Hemochron and a laboratory-based anti-Xa (anti-factor Xa) assay.

Design.—: All ACT measurements were performed in duplicate, using 2 Hemochron and 2 i-STAT devices in 53 samples from 15 unique multidose heparin administrations in NIR procedures and 110 samples in cardiovascular procedures. Samples were tested simultaneously within 1 minute of each other.

Results.—: For 12 of the 15 procedures in NIR, anti-Xa was assessed at the beginning of the procedure and at the end of all procedural dosing. We also reviewed the patient's charts anonymously for any indication of postprocedural neurological bleeding. Interinstrument variability was much higher with Hemochron than with i-STAT. We also observed lower ACT values with i-STAT than with Hemochron. Therefore, the historical ACT range of 250 to 300 seconds for Hemochron was revised to 200 to 250 seconds for i-STAT devices. In the therapeutic window for anti-Xa, ACT results from both instruments exhibited a linear correlation. However, at supratherapeutic range for anti-Xa, ACT results from Hemochron exhibited more linear correlation, while i-STAT ACT demonstrated a plateau effect. No patient had any evidence of severe postprocedural neurological bleeding.

Conclusions.—: The i-STAT analyzers produce more reproducible ACT results, but the target range should be lowered to 200 to 250 seconds. This range appears to provide adequate and safe heparin therapy, confirmed by anti-Xa assay results and clinical outcome.

某学术医学中心神经介入放射学中激活凝血时间肝素治疗窗口的临床评价
上下文。-:活化凝血时间(ACT)在神经介入放射学(NIR)中监测肝素治疗是有用的。我们以前使用的是血色素标记精英仪器来测量nir中的ACT。-:通过比较i-STAT与haemchron和基于实验室的抗Xa(抗Xa因子)测定法的性能,评估在近红外中使用i-STAT测量ACT的适用性。-:所有ACT测量都是重复进行的,使用2个hemchron和2个i-STAT设备对来自近红外手术中15种独特多剂量肝素治疗的53个样本和110个心血管手术中的样本进行了测量。样品在间隔1分钟内同时检测。-:对于NIR中15个程序中的12个,在程序开始和所有程序给药结束时评估anti-Xa。我们还匿名查看了病人的病历,看有无术后神经出血的迹象。与i-STAT相比,使用hemchron的仪器间变异性要高得多。我们还观察到i-STAT比hemchron的ACT值更低。因此,历史上的250到300秒的ACT范围被修改为200到250秒的i-STAT设备。在抗xa的治疗窗口中,两种仪器的ACT结果呈线性相关。然而,在抗xa的超治疗范围内,hemchron的ACT结果表现出更多的线性相关性,而i-STAT的ACT表现出平台效应。没有患者有严重的术后神经出血的证据。-: i-STAT分析仪产生更多可重复的ACT结果,但目标范围应降低到200至250秒。抗xa检测结果和临床结果证实,这个范围似乎提供了足够和安全的肝素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信