Clinical Evaluation of the Heparin Therapeutic Window Using Activated Clotting Time in Neurological Interventional Radiology at an Academic Medical Center.

Melody B Nelson, Amitava Dasgupta, X Long Zheng
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of the Heparin Therapeutic Window Using Activated Clotting Time in Neurological Interventional Radiology at an Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Melody B Nelson, Amitava Dasgupta, X Long Zheng","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0399-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Activated clotting time (ACT) is useful for monitoring heparin therapy in neurointerventional radiology (NIR). We previously used the Hemochron Signature Elite instrument for measuring ACT in NIR.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the suitability of measuring ACT using i-STAT in NIR by comparing its performance with Hemochron and a laboratory-based anti-Xa (anti-factor Xa) assay.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>All ACT measurements were performed in duplicate, using 2 Hemochron and 2 i-STAT devices in 53 samples from 15 unique multidose heparin administrations in NIR procedures and 110 samples in cardiovascular procedures. Samples were tested simultaneously within 1 minute of each other.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>For 12 of the 15 procedures in NIR, anti-Xa was assessed at the beginning of the procedure and at the end of all procedural dosing. We also reviewed the patient's charts anonymously for any indication of postprocedural neurological bleeding. Interinstrument variability was much higher with Hemochron than with i-STAT. We also observed lower ACT values with i-STAT than with Hemochron. Therefore, the historical ACT range of 250 to 300 seconds for Hemochron was revised to 200 to 250 seconds for i-STAT devices. In the therapeutic window for anti-Xa, ACT results from both instruments exhibited a linear correlation. However, at supratherapeutic range for anti-Xa, ACT results from Hemochron exhibited more linear correlation, while i-STAT ACT demonstrated a plateau effect. No patient had any evidence of severe postprocedural neurological bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The i-STAT analyzers produce more reproducible ACT results, but the target range should be lowered to 200 to 250 seconds. This range appears to provide adequate and safe heparin therapy, confirmed by anti-Xa assay results and clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0399-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Activated clotting time (ACT) is useful for monitoring heparin therapy in neurointerventional radiology (NIR). We previously used the Hemochron Signature Elite instrument for measuring ACT in NIR.

Objective.—: To evaluate the suitability of measuring ACT using i-STAT in NIR by comparing its performance with Hemochron and a laboratory-based anti-Xa (anti-factor Xa) assay.

Design.—: All ACT measurements were performed in duplicate, using 2 Hemochron and 2 i-STAT devices in 53 samples from 15 unique multidose heparin administrations in NIR procedures and 110 samples in cardiovascular procedures. Samples were tested simultaneously within 1 minute of each other.

Results.—: For 12 of the 15 procedures in NIR, anti-Xa was assessed at the beginning of the procedure and at the end of all procedural dosing. We also reviewed the patient's charts anonymously for any indication of postprocedural neurological bleeding. Interinstrument variability was much higher with Hemochron than with i-STAT. We also observed lower ACT values with i-STAT than with Hemochron. Therefore, the historical ACT range of 250 to 300 seconds for Hemochron was revised to 200 to 250 seconds for i-STAT devices. In the therapeutic window for anti-Xa, ACT results from both instruments exhibited a linear correlation. However, at supratherapeutic range for anti-Xa, ACT results from Hemochron exhibited more linear correlation, while i-STAT ACT demonstrated a plateau effect. No patient had any evidence of severe postprocedural neurological bleeding.

Conclusions.—: The i-STAT analyzers produce more reproducible ACT results, but the target range should be lowered to 200 to 250 seconds. This range appears to provide adequate and safe heparin therapy, confirmed by anti-Xa assay results and clinical outcome.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信