The Road Map for ACR Practice Accreditation for Radiology Artificial Intelligence

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
David B. Larson MD, MBA , Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield PhD , Michael Tilkin MS , Laura Coombs PhD , Christoph Wald MD, PhD, MBA
{"title":"The Road Map for ACR Practice Accreditation for Radiology Artificial Intelligence","authors":"David B. Larson MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Tilkin MS ,&nbsp;Laura Coombs PhD ,&nbsp;Christoph Wald MD, PhD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to grow in radiology, it has become clear that its real-world performance often differs from that demonstrated in premarket testing, underscoring the need for robust quality management (QM) programs at local institutions. For decades, a key mechanism to ensure QM in radiology practices has been ACR accreditation. However, no such program currently exists for AI in radiology. As leaders of the ACR Commissions on Quality and Safety and Informatics, we are dedicated to establishing ACR accreditation for radiology AI. In this article, we outline our plan for this effort. ACR accreditation is a peer-reviewed process that evaluates radiology practices according to ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards, which are consensus-based guidelines aimed at improving care quality and reducing variability. ACR Practice Parameters focus on clinical aspects like patient management, and Technical Standards address the performance of imaging and treatment equipment. To support the development of this accreditation program, the ACR Recognized Center for Healthcare-AI (ARCH-AI) program has been established as a precursor to formal accreditation. ARCH-AI participants attest to meeting minimum criteria in areas such as governance, model selection, acceptance testing, monitoring, and management of locally developed models. Insights gained from ARCH-AI will inform the development of the formal accreditation program, which will culminate in ACR Council approval, currently anticipated in spring 2027. The College remains committed to fostering dialogue among members and stakeholders to ensure AI fulfills its promise of enhancing patient care safely and effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages 586-592"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025001127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to grow in radiology, it has become clear that its real-world performance often differs from that demonstrated in premarket testing, underscoring the need for robust quality management (QM) programs at local institutions. For decades, a key mechanism to ensure QM in radiology practices has been ACR accreditation. However, no such program currently exists for AI in radiology. As leaders of the ACR Commissions on Quality and Safety and Informatics, we are dedicated to establishing ACR accreditation for radiology AI. In this article, we outline our plan for this effort. ACR accreditation is a peer-reviewed process that evaluates radiology practices according to ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards, which are consensus-based guidelines aimed at improving care quality and reducing variability. ACR Practice Parameters focus on clinical aspects like patient management, and Technical Standards address the performance of imaging and treatment equipment. To support the development of this accreditation program, the ACR Recognized Center for Healthcare-AI (ARCH-AI) program has been established as a precursor to formal accreditation. ARCH-AI participants attest to meeting minimum criteria in areas such as governance, model selection, acceptance testing, monitoring, and management of locally developed models. Insights gained from ARCH-AI will inform the development of the formal accreditation program, which will culminate in ACR Council approval, currently anticipated in spring 2027. The College remains committed to fostering dialogue among members and stakeholders to ensure AI fulfills its promise of enhancing patient care safely and effectively.
放射学人工智能ACR执业认证路线图。
随着人工智能(AI)在放射学中的应用不断增加,很明显,它的实际表现往往与上市前测试中的表现不同,这强调了当地机构对强大的质量管理(QM)计划的需求。几十年来,ACR认证一直是确保放射学实践中质量管理的关键机制。然而,目前在放射学中还没有这样的人工智能程序。作为ACR质量安全和信息学委员会的领导者,我们致力于为放射学人工智能建立ACR认证。在本文中,我们概述了这项工作的计划。ACR认证是一个同行评审的过程,根据ACR实践参数和技术标准评估放射学实践,这是基于共识的指导方针,旨在提高护理质量和减少可变性。ACR实践参数侧重于临床方面,如患者管理,技术标准涉及成像和治疗设备的性能。为了支持这一认证计划的发展,ACR认可的医疗保健人工智能中心(ARCH-AI)计划已经建立,作为正式认证的先驱。ARCH-AI参与者证明在治理、模型选择、验收测试、监控和本地开发模型的管理等方面满足最低标准。从ARCH-AI中获得的见解将为正式认证计划的发展提供信息,该计划将最终获得ACR理事会的批准,目前预计将于2027年春季获得批准。学院继续致力于促进成员和利益相关者之间的对话,以确保人工智能履行其安全有效地加强患者护理的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信