Barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs: A scoping review.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
L Fischer, R G M Smeets, M Rijken, A M J Elissen
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs: A scoping review.","authors":"L Fischer, R G M Smeets, M Rijken, A M J Elissen","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care attempts to address multiple care needs, but barriers to implementation remain. The service user perspective can guide policy and practice to advance implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature. Eligible studies were analysed by categorising barriers and facilitators at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the healthcare system. They were further mapped by the components retrieved from the SELFIE framework for integrated care for multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 34 included studies, people with multiple care needs identified more barriers and facilitators at the micro level than at the meso and macro levels. Mapped under 'the individual and their environment', social and personal barriers (e.g. socioeconomic disadvantages, lack of social support) hindered integrated care. Mapped under 'service delivery' and 'workforce', a trusting relationship with a key care provider as part of a multidisciplinary care team was identified to facilitate integrated care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that 'soft' relational and social factors are critical to integrated care. These 'soft' factors are primarily created at the micro level, but seem actionable at meso and macro levels. The unique perspective of people with multiple care needs suggests that more rigorous involvement of service users at higher levels is needed to inform policymakers and care providers on how to shape enabling conditions for the implementation of integrated care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"105283"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrated care attempts to address multiple care needs, but barriers to implementation remain. The service user perspective can guide policy and practice to advance implementation.

Objective: To map barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature. Eligible studies were analysed by categorising barriers and facilitators at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the healthcare system. They were further mapped by the components retrieved from the SELFIE framework for integrated care for multimorbidity.

Results: Across the 34 included studies, people with multiple care needs identified more barriers and facilitators at the micro level than at the meso and macro levels. Mapped under 'the individual and their environment', social and personal barriers (e.g. socioeconomic disadvantages, lack of social support) hindered integrated care. Mapped under 'service delivery' and 'workforce', a trusting relationship with a key care provider as part of a multidisciplinary care team was identified to facilitate integrated care.

Conclusions: Our findings show that 'soft' relational and social factors are critical to integrated care. These 'soft' factors are primarily created at the micro level, but seem actionable at meso and macro levels. The unique perspective of people with multiple care needs suggests that more rigorous involvement of service users at higher levels is needed to inform policymakers and care providers on how to shape enabling conditions for the implementation of integrated care.

从慢性病患者和多重护理需求的角度看综合初级保健的障碍和促进因素:范围审查
背景:综合护理试图解决多种护理需求,但实施的障碍仍然存在。服务用户视角可以指导政策和实践以推进实施。目的:从慢性病患者和多重护理需求的角度分析综合初级保健的障碍和促进因素。方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL和灰色文献进行范围综述。通过对医疗保健系统的微观、中观和宏观层面的障碍和促进因素进行分类,对符合条件的研究进行了分析。通过对多病综合护理的自拍框架检索的组件进一步绘制了它们。结果:在34项纳入的研究中,有多种护理需求的人在微观层面上比在中观和宏观层面上发现了更多的障碍和促进因素。在“个人及其环境”下,社会和个人障碍(如社会经济劣势、缺乏社会支持)阻碍了综合护理。在“服务交付”和“劳动力”下,与关键护理提供者建立信任关系,作为多学科护理团队的一部分,以促进综合护理。结论:我们的研究结果表明,“软”关系和社会因素对综合护理至关重要。这些“软”因素主要是在微观层面产生的,但在中观和宏观层面似乎是可行的。有多种护理需求的人的独特视角表明,需要更高层次的服务使用者更严格地参与,以便向决策者和护理提供者提供信息,了解如何为实施综合护理创造有利条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信