Lower Patient-Reported Outcomes After Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Associated With Lower Muscle Strength Rather Than Graft Status During Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation.
Seo-Jun Lee, Jun-Gu Park, Seung-Beom Han, Ji-Hoon Bae, Ki-Mo Jang
{"title":"Lower Patient-Reported Outcomes After Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Associated With Lower Muscle Strength Rather Than Graft Status During Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation.","authors":"Seo-Jun Lee, Jun-Gu Park, Seung-Beom Han, Ji-Hoon Bae, Ki-Mo Jang","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the relationship between patient-reported outcomes (PROs), objective graft status on second-look arthroscopy, and knee muscle strength during the early period after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy at least 1 year after primary ACLR between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who completed follow-up muscle strength tests and PRO measures were included in this study. Subjective clinical outcomes were assessed on the basis of patient-reported outcome measures using the Lysholm score preoperatively and during second-look arthroscopy. Objective graft status was assessed during second-look arthroscopy using a numeric scale system consisting of the following 4 subscales: tension, vascularity, synovialization, and continuity of the graft. The graft score (0-8) was determined by adding the points from each subscale (0-2). Muscle strength was measured using isokinetic dynamometry to assess peak torque, limb symmetry index for both the quadriceps and hamstrings and the ratio of the hamstring and quadriceps before second-look arthroscopy. Second-look arthroscopy patients included in analysis were those without concomitant meniscal or cartilage procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with inferior PROs (Lysholm score ≤83).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 82 patients were enrolled in this study. At an average follow-up of 22.4 ± 4.8 months, 25 patients (30.5%) scored less than 83 on the Lysholm scale. No significant differences were found in total graft status scores between groups with superior or inferior outcomes (6.9 ± 1.8 vs 7.1 ± 1.2, P = .573). However, the group with inferior PROs showed significantly lower peak torque in both hamstring and quadriceps (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that older age and lower limb symmetry index for extension and flexion (<70% and 90%, respectively) were significantly correlated with inferior PROs (odds ratios: 1.08, 5.11, and 5.66; P = .014, .013, and .006, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early inferior subjective outcomes after ACLR were associated with delayed recovery of quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength compared to graft appearance and tension.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the relationship between patient-reported outcomes (PROs), objective graft status on second-look arthroscopy, and knee muscle strength during the early period after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods: Patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy at least 1 year after primary ACLR between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who completed follow-up muscle strength tests and PRO measures were included in this study. Subjective clinical outcomes were assessed on the basis of patient-reported outcome measures using the Lysholm score preoperatively and during second-look arthroscopy. Objective graft status was assessed during second-look arthroscopy using a numeric scale system consisting of the following 4 subscales: tension, vascularity, synovialization, and continuity of the graft. The graft score (0-8) was determined by adding the points from each subscale (0-2). Muscle strength was measured using isokinetic dynamometry to assess peak torque, limb symmetry index for both the quadriceps and hamstrings and the ratio of the hamstring and quadriceps before second-look arthroscopy. Second-look arthroscopy patients included in analysis were those without concomitant meniscal or cartilage procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with inferior PROs (Lysholm score ≤83).
Results: A total of 82 patients were enrolled in this study. At an average follow-up of 22.4 ± 4.8 months, 25 patients (30.5%) scored less than 83 on the Lysholm scale. No significant differences were found in total graft status scores between groups with superior or inferior outcomes (6.9 ± 1.8 vs 7.1 ± 1.2, P = .573). However, the group with inferior PROs showed significantly lower peak torque in both hamstring and quadriceps (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that older age and lower limb symmetry index for extension and flexion (<70% and 90%, respectively) were significantly correlated with inferior PROs (odds ratios: 1.08, 5.11, and 5.66; P = .014, .013, and .006, respectively).
Conclusions: Early inferior subjective outcomes after ACLR were associated with delayed recovery of quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength compared to graft appearance and tension.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.