Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area- a broad evaluation of performance.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6
Per Molander
{"title":"Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area- a broad evaluation of performance.","authors":"Per Molander","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare systems can be categorised along the public/private axis into two main types: publicly administered systems and systems based on compulsory health insurance provided by the private sector. Within the OECD area, the latter group has expanded over time, particularly with the inclusion of new member states from Eastern Europe and Central and Latin America. This study compares the efficiency of these two models across the 38 member countries, utilising a broad spectrum of performance indicators developed by the OECD secretariat. Data from the most recent available year, typically 2021, were analysed. On average, performance improves with an increase in healthcare budgets; however, further enhancements come at rising costs. The analysis concludes that there is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that transitioning from a publicly administered system to a privately dominated system will enhance efficiency. By contrast, there is strong evidence that overall efficiency increases with the public share of financing. These conclusions also hold true for the more restricted group of OECD countries in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1163-1173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare systems can be categorised along the public/private axis into two main types: publicly administered systems and systems based on compulsory health insurance provided by the private sector. Within the OECD area, the latter group has expanded over time, particularly with the inclusion of new member states from Eastern Europe and Central and Latin America. This study compares the efficiency of these two models across the 38 member countries, utilising a broad spectrum of performance indicators developed by the OECD secretariat. Data from the most recent available year, typically 2021, were analysed. On average, performance improves with an increase in healthcare budgets; however, further enhancements come at rising costs. The analysis concludes that there is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that transitioning from a publicly administered system to a privately dominated system will enhance efficiency. By contrast, there is strong evidence that overall efficiency increases with the public share of financing. These conclusions also hold true for the more restricted group of OECD countries in Europe.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经合组织地区的公共与私人医疗保健系统——对绩效的广泛评估。
医疗保健系统可以沿着公共/私人轴分为两种主要类型:公共管理系统和基于私营部门提供的强制性医疗保险的系统。在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)内部,后一组随着时间的推移而扩大,特别是随着东欧、中美洲和拉丁美洲的新成员国的加入。本研究利用经合组织秘书处制定的广泛绩效指标,比较了这两种模式在38个成员国中的效率。研究人员分析了最近一年(通常是2021年)的数据。平均而言,绩效随着医疗预算的增加而提高;然而,进一步的改进需要不断增加的成本。分析的结论是,没有证据支持从公共管理系统过渡到私人主导系统将提高效率的假设。相比之下,有强有力的证据表明,总体效率随着公共融资份额的增加而提高。这些结论同样适用于受限制较多的欧洲经合组织国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信