Lateral mass intrapedicular screw fixation: A radiological evaluation of screw pullout strength.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Kota Kojima, Hiroaki Kanbe, Kenichiro Fukui, Takahiro Endo, Yasuyuki Fukui, Masayuki Ishikawa, Shunji Asamoto
{"title":"Lateral mass intrapedicular screw fixation: A radiological evaluation of screw pullout strength.","authors":"Kota Kojima, Hiroaki Kanbe, Kenichiro Fukui, Takahiro Endo, Yasuyuki Fukui, Masayuki Ishikawa, Shunji Asamoto","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_160_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral mass intrapedicular screw (LMIS) fixation was introduced in 2021 as a safe and simple alternative method for the fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in the treatment of various cervical spine diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the screw pullout strength of this new technique to the trajectories of two other major methods, the transpedicular screw (TPS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and three patients who underwent a cervical computed tomography (CT) scan at our institution were included in the study. A region of interest for each of the three trajectories was selected using axial slices of the cervical vertebra from C3 through C6, and the CT number (Hounsfield unit) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4872 data points were collected. The average age of the patients was 59.5 years. The male-to-female ratio was 135:68. The number of patients over the age of 65 was 93. The average CT numbers were 511.9 for TPS, 473.1 for LMS, and 598.5 for LMIS. There was a significant difference in the CT number among the three trajectories, even when adjusted for sex and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LMIS is a promising alternative to the common methods used for subaxial cervical spine fixation that has a significant pullout strength. This approach is worth considering in many patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"15 4","pages":"398-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_160_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral mass intrapedicular screw (LMIS) fixation was introduced in 2021 as a safe and simple alternative method for the fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in the treatment of various cervical spine diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the screw pullout strength of this new technique to the trajectories of two other major methods, the transpedicular screw (TPS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) methods.

Methods: Two hundred and three patients who underwent a cervical computed tomography (CT) scan at our institution were included in the study. A region of interest for each of the three trajectories was selected using axial slices of the cervical vertebra from C3 through C6, and the CT number (Hounsfield unit) was calculated.

Results: A total of 4872 data points were collected. The average age of the patients was 59.5 years. The male-to-female ratio was 135:68. The number of patients over the age of 65 was 93. The average CT numbers were 511.9 for TPS, 473.1 for LMS, and 598.5 for LMIS. There was a significant difference in the CT number among the three trajectories, even when adjusted for sex and age.

Conclusion: LMIS is a promising alternative to the common methods used for subaxial cervical spine fixation that has a significant pullout strength. This approach is worth considering in many patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信