Efficacy of distal peripheral nerve blocks in lumbar radicular pain: A randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Vivek Jha, Gaurav Kumar Sharma, Omeshwar Singh, Jatin Aggarwal
{"title":"Efficacy of distal peripheral nerve blocks in lumbar radicular pain: A randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.","authors":"Vivek Jha, Gaurav Kumar Sharma, Omeshwar Singh, Jatin Aggarwal","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_90_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Inflamed nerve root leads to mechano-sensitization and upregulation of sodium channels in nerve endings far distal to the site of inflammation, leading to tenderness of these nerve endings. Due to pseudounipolar nature, the blockade of sodium channels at peripheral nerve endings leads to relief in radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bupivacaine in improving pain and straight leg raising test (SLRT), 30 min after injection around tender nerves near the ankle, in patients with unilateral radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients of single-level lumbar disc prolapse and unilateral radicular pain were randomized into two equal groups. Three nerves (sural nerve, lateral branch of deep peroneal nerve and posterior tibial nerve) were assessed for tenderness around the ankle. Bupivacaine (0.5%) was injected around each tender nerve in the case group whereas equal volume of normal saline was injected in the control group around each tender nerve. Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and SLRT were checked before and 30 min postinjection. A proportion of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of NRS ≤4 and MCID of SLRT ≥30° were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean decrease in NRS among cases was from 8.06 ± 1.236 to 3.90 ± 2.013 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) with 78% achieving MCID. A mean decrease in NRS in the control group was from 7.88 ± 1.023 to 7.66 ± 1.171 (<i>P</i> = 0.084), and only 2% of patients achieved MCID. There was a statistically significant improvement in SLR in the case group (40.90°-60.90°, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and 54% showed a clinically significant improvement by crossing MCID threshold. The control group showed nonsignificant improvement in SLRT (38.10°-39.10°, <i>P</i> = 0.351), and only 2% achieved MCID.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In single-level lumbar disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain, injection of bupivacaine 0.5% (a sodium channel blocker) around tender nerves near the ankle provides clinically significant relief in pain and SLRT at 30 min when compared to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"15 4","pages":"448-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_90_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Inflamed nerve root leads to mechano-sensitization and upregulation of sodium channels in nerve endings far distal to the site of inflammation, leading to tenderness of these nerve endings. Due to pseudounipolar nature, the blockade of sodium channels at peripheral nerve endings leads to relief in radicular pain.

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bupivacaine in improving pain and straight leg raising test (SLRT), 30 min after injection around tender nerves near the ankle, in patients with unilateral radicular pain.

Design: This was a randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.

Methods: One hundred patients of single-level lumbar disc prolapse and unilateral radicular pain were randomized into two equal groups. Three nerves (sural nerve, lateral branch of deep peroneal nerve and posterior tibial nerve) were assessed for tenderness around the ankle. Bupivacaine (0.5%) was injected around each tender nerve in the case group whereas equal volume of normal saline was injected in the control group around each tender nerve. Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and SLRT were checked before and 30 min postinjection. A proportion of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of NRS ≤4 and MCID of SLRT ≥30° were compared.

Results: A mean decrease in NRS among cases was from 8.06 ± 1.236 to 3.90 ± 2.013 (P < 0.001) with 78% achieving MCID. A mean decrease in NRS in the control group was from 7.88 ± 1.023 to 7.66 ± 1.171 (P = 0.084), and only 2% of patients achieved MCID. There was a statistically significant improvement in SLR in the case group (40.90°-60.90°, P < 0.001), and 54% showed a clinically significant improvement by crossing MCID threshold. The control group showed nonsignificant improvement in SLRT (38.10°-39.10°, P = 0.351), and only 2% achieved MCID.

Conclusions: In single-level lumbar disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain, injection of bupivacaine 0.5% (a sodium channel blocker) around tender nerves near the ankle provides clinically significant relief in pain and SLRT at 30 min when compared to placebo.

远端周围神经阻滞治疗腰椎痛的疗效:三盲随机安慰剂对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信