V A Znamensky, K V Chelnyntsev, M A Lisovsky, E A Lyasnikova, M Yu Sitnikova, P A Fedotov
{"title":"[Effectiveness Analysis of The I NEED HELP Scale For Prognostic Evaluation of Heart Transplant Waiting List Patients].","authors":"V A Znamensky, K V Chelnyntsev, M A Lisovsky, E A Lyasnikova, M Yu Sitnikova, P A Fedotov","doi":"10.18087/cardio.2025.2.n2830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim To evaluate the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in determining the six-month prognosis for patients on the heart transplant waiting list (HTWL) of the Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.Material and methods This retrospective study included 42 patients from the HTWL. The patients' survival for more than 6 months was assessed. The composite end point (CEP) of adverse outcome was all-cause death, heart transplantation (HT) due to the increased urgency of surgical intervention according to UNOS within 6 months after the inclusion in the HTWL. Patients were evaluated using the I NEED HELP scale. Statistical analysis was performed by nonparametric methods.Results The median I NEED HELP score was 4 [from 1 to 7]. The increase in score was positively correlated with the incidence of adverse outcomes (r=0.5; p=0.0007). The group of patients with an unfavorable outcome had a median score higher by one than for the survivors (score 5 vs. 4, respectively; p=0.001). The greatest effect on the prognosis was exerted by low systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=0.003); the failure to increase or the necessity to decrease the doses of disease-modifying drugs (p=0.039); and target organ dysfunction (p=0.039). The sensitivity and specificity of the scale at a score 5 or higher were 100% and 84%, respectively.Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in a patient population from a specialized center HTWL with high sensitivity and specificity at the determined threshold score 5 for an unfavorable outcome. It is appropriate to continue the study with an expanded sample and validation of the scale on patient cohorts from hospitals of various healthcare system levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":54750,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologiya","volume":"65 2","pages":"64-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologiya","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2025.2.n2830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in determining the six-month prognosis for patients on the heart transplant waiting list (HTWL) of the Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.Material and methods This retrospective study included 42 patients from the HTWL. The patients' survival for more than 6 months was assessed. The composite end point (CEP) of adverse outcome was all-cause death, heart transplantation (HT) due to the increased urgency of surgical intervention according to UNOS within 6 months after the inclusion in the HTWL. Patients were evaluated using the I NEED HELP scale. Statistical analysis was performed by nonparametric methods.Results The median I NEED HELP score was 4 [from 1 to 7]. The increase in score was positively correlated with the incidence of adverse outcomes (r=0.5; p=0.0007). The group of patients with an unfavorable outcome had a median score higher by one than for the survivors (score 5 vs. 4, respectively; p=0.001). The greatest effect on the prognosis was exerted by low systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=0.003); the failure to increase or the necessity to decrease the doses of disease-modifying drugs (p=0.039); and target organ dysfunction (p=0.039). The sensitivity and specificity of the scale at a score 5 or higher were 100% and 84%, respectively.Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in a patient population from a specialized center HTWL with high sensitivity and specificity at the determined threshold score 5 for an unfavorable outcome. It is appropriate to continue the study with an expanded sample and validation of the scale on patient cohorts from hospitals of various healthcare system levels.
期刊介绍:
“Kardiologiya” (Cardiology) is a monthly scientific, peer-reviewed journal committed to both basic cardiovascular medicine and practical aspects of cardiology.
As the leader in its field, “Kardiologiya” provides original coverage of recent progress in cardiovascular medicine. We publish state-of-the-art articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. Our target audience spans a diversity of health care professionals and medical researchers working in cardiovascular medicine and related fields.
The principal language of the Journal is Russian, an additional language – English (title, authors’ information, abstract, keywords).
“Kardiologiya” is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. All articles are reviewed by scientists, who gained high international prestige in cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology. The Journal is currently cited and indexed in major Abstracting & Indexing databases: Web of Science, Medline and Scopus.
The Journal''s primary objectives
Contribute to raising the professional level of medical researchers, physicians and academic teachers.
Present the results of current research and clinical observations, explore the effectiveness of drug and non-drug treatments of heart disease, inform about new diagnostic techniques; discuss current trends and new advancements in clinical cardiology, contribute to continuing medical education, inform readers about results of Russian and international scientific forums;
Further improve the general quality of reviewing and editing of manuscripts submitted for publication;
Provide the widest possible dissemination of the published articles, among the global scientific community;
Extend distribution and indexing of scientific publications in major Abstracting & Indexing databases.