An evaluation of the feasibility and clinical utility of the Diego™ computer-assisted robotics device for use with people with a cervical spinal cord injury in the acute setting: a mixed method pilot study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Lynette Mackenzie, Emma Su Zan Tan, Lisa Benad
{"title":"An evaluation of the feasibility and clinical utility of the Diego™ computer-assisted robotics device for use with people with a cervical spinal cord injury in the acute setting: a mixed method pilot study.","authors":"Lynette Mackenzie, Emma Su Zan Tan, Lisa Benad","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2476028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the feasibility and clinical utility of the Diego™ for people with a cervical spinal cord injury (CSI) in an acute spinal ward.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods study included prospective measurement of outcomes and qualitative interviews with participants and health professionals. A 22 day (4.4 weeks Monday to Friday) program incorporating baseline and follow up measurements, 2 × 1-h standard upper limb sessions per week, and 3 × 1-h Diego™ sessions per week were designed for implementation. Participants were assessed on recruitment and at the completion of the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven eligible patients (6 male and 1 female) and eight health professionals participated. Participants improved in most muscle strength and range of motion scores across upper limb joints although these were not statistically significant, Spinal Cord Independence Measure scores (14.29 at baseline to 18.29 at follow up, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and fatigue scores (reduction of 1.57 points, <i>p</i> = 0.577). Pain scores remained stable. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure indicated improvements in performance (+2.20 points, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and satisfaction scores (+2.53 points, <i>p</i> = 0.028). Qualitative findings from both participants and health professionals indicated that participants experienced psychological benefits using the Diego™.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some gains in functioning occurred. Further research should include a randomised controlled trial to fully evaluate the effectiveness of the Diego™ in acute settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2476028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the feasibility and clinical utility of the Diego™ for people with a cervical spinal cord injury (CSI) in an acute spinal ward.

Materials and methods: A mixed methods study included prospective measurement of outcomes and qualitative interviews with participants and health professionals. A 22 day (4.4 weeks Monday to Friday) program incorporating baseline and follow up measurements, 2 × 1-h standard upper limb sessions per week, and 3 × 1-h Diego™ sessions per week were designed for implementation. Participants were assessed on recruitment and at the completion of the program.

Results: Seven eligible patients (6 male and 1 female) and eight health professionals participated. Participants improved in most muscle strength and range of motion scores across upper limb joints although these were not statistically significant, Spinal Cord Independence Measure scores (14.29 at baseline to 18.29 at follow up, p = 0.01) and fatigue scores (reduction of 1.57 points, p = 0.577). Pain scores remained stable. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure indicated improvements in performance (+2.20 points, p = 0.028) and satisfaction scores (+2.53 points, p = 0.028). Qualitative findings from both participants and health professionals indicated that participants experienced psychological benefits using the Diego™.

Conclusions: Some gains in functioning occurred. Further research should include a randomised controlled trial to fully evaluate the effectiveness of the Diego™ in acute settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信