Engineering a Quality Management System for Academic Research: Navigating Challenges to Comply with the New Medical Device Regulations in Europe.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S448049
Mirka Buist, Max Ortiz-Catalan
{"title":"Engineering a Quality Management System for Academic Research: Navigating Challenges to Comply with the New Medical Device Regulations in Europe.","authors":"Mirka Buist, Max Ortiz-Catalan","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S448049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The new Medical Device Regulations (MDR) in Europe represent unprecedented challenges for researchers in academic environments. Adherence to regulatory frameworks, like the Medical Device Directive (MDD), was mostly relevant for projects nearing commercialization. However, the MDR now extends its reach into the preliminary phases of pre-clinical research, imposing new challenges and necessitating compliance for any clinical investigation involving medical device safety or performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have systematically engineered and implemented a Quality Management System (QMS) tailored to meet the distinct needs of academic institutions. Our objective was to establish a comprehensive framework that enable our research group to comply with MDR without hindering innovation and discovery. Specifically, we engineered a traditional commercial QMS aligned with ISO13485 to fulfill academic needs. We ensured the QMS focused on requirements relevant to pre-market clinical investigations and considered appropriate roles for an academic setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present an optimized QMS implementation to satisfy the urgent need for research institutions to align with the MDR. Notably, our efforts yielded demonstrable results, culminating in the successful approval of research projects by the Swedish Medical Product Agency (MPA). This achievement stands as a testament to the impact of our work within the regulatory landscape.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Here, we share the insights and challenges we encountered during the implementation of an appropriate and efficient QMS for academic research, which we believe can serve as a guiding example for other academic research groups. By presenting our QMS implementation validated by an MPA clinical investigation approval, we aim to raise awareness about the pivotal importance of MDR compliance among researchers in Europe. Our contribution seeks to provide a roadmap for fellow research groups in navigating the evolving regulatory landscape while sustaining their focus on groundbreaking research and innovation in the field of biomedical engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"137-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S448049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The new Medical Device Regulations (MDR) in Europe represent unprecedented challenges for researchers in academic environments. Adherence to regulatory frameworks, like the Medical Device Directive (MDD), was mostly relevant for projects nearing commercialization. However, the MDR now extends its reach into the preliminary phases of pre-clinical research, imposing new challenges and necessitating compliance for any clinical investigation involving medical device safety or performance.

Methods: We have systematically engineered and implemented a Quality Management System (QMS) tailored to meet the distinct needs of academic institutions. Our objective was to establish a comprehensive framework that enable our research group to comply with MDR without hindering innovation and discovery. Specifically, we engineered a traditional commercial QMS aligned with ISO13485 to fulfill academic needs. We ensured the QMS focused on requirements relevant to pre-market clinical investigations and considered appropriate roles for an academic setting.

Results: We present an optimized QMS implementation to satisfy the urgent need for research institutions to align with the MDR. Notably, our efforts yielded demonstrable results, culminating in the successful approval of research projects by the Swedish Medical Product Agency (MPA). This achievement stands as a testament to the impact of our work within the regulatory landscape.

Conclusion: Here, we share the insights and challenges we encountered during the implementation of an appropriate and efficient QMS for academic research, which we believe can serve as a guiding example for other academic research groups. By presenting our QMS implementation validated by an MPA clinical investigation approval, we aim to raise awareness about the pivotal importance of MDR compliance among researchers in Europe. Our contribution seeks to provide a roadmap for fellow research groups in navigating the evolving regulatory landscape while sustaining their focus on groundbreaking research and innovation in the field of biomedical engineering.

工程学术研究质量管理体系:导航挑战,以符合新的医疗器械法规在欧洲。
目的:欧洲新的医疗器械法规(MDR)对学术环境中的研究人员提出了前所未有的挑战。遵守监管框架,如医疗器械指令(MDD),主要与接近商业化的项目有关。然而,MDR现在将其范围扩展到临床前研究的初步阶段,这给涉及医疗器械安全性或性能的任何临床研究带来了新的挑战和合规要求。方法:我们系统地设计和实施了一个质量管理体系(QMS),以满足学术机构的不同需求。我们的目标是建立一个全面的框架,使我们的研究小组能够在不阻碍创新和发现的情况下遵守MDR。具体来说,我们设计了一个符合ISO13485标准的传统商业质量管理体系,以满足学术需求。我们确保质量管理体系关注与上市前临床调查相关的要求,并考虑学术环境中的适当角色。结果:我们提出了一个优化的质量管理体系实施方案,以满足研究机构与MDR保持一致的迫切需要。值得注意的是,我们的努力取得了明显的成果,最终成功批准了瑞典医疗产品管理局(MPA)的研究项目。这一成就证明了我们的工作对监管领域的影响。总结:在此,我们分享了我们在学术研究中实施合适、高效的质量管理体系过程中所遇到的见解和挑战,相信可以为其他学术研究团队提供指导。通过展示经MPA临床研究批准验证的质量管理体系实施,我们的目标是提高欧洲研究人员对MDR合规性的关键重要性的认识。我们的贡献旨在为其他研究小组提供路线图,以导航不断变化的监管环境,同时保持他们对生物医学工程领域开创性研究和创新的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信