{"title":"Aortic Root Replacement: Should We Wait Until 5 cm?","authors":"Marc R Moon, Puja Kachroo","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical replacement of the ascending aorta and root was first undertaken in the 1950s although methodologies were rudimentary compared to the current era. Advances in brain protection and surgical technique have made complex root procedures relatively low risk in experienced hands. The standard critieria for elective replacement of the root and ascending aorta has been 5.5 cm when there is no connective tissue etiology for the aneurysm. Recent literature has suggested that a more liberal criteria would may be appropriate in healthy patient at low risk, patients with high-risk features including strong family history of adverse aortic events, and in centers whose outcomes are such that the risk of surgery at lower aortic size is far less than the risk of progression of disease or significant adverse event. This manuscript critically evaluates recent literature to suggest in which patients and at what type of centers a more aggressive prophylactic approach should be entertained.</p>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.02.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Surgical replacement of the ascending aorta and root was first undertaken in the 1950s although methodologies were rudimentary compared to the current era. Advances in brain protection and surgical technique have made complex root procedures relatively low risk in experienced hands. The standard critieria for elective replacement of the root and ascending aorta has been 5.5 cm when there is no connective tissue etiology for the aneurysm. Recent literature has suggested that a more liberal criteria would may be appropriate in healthy patient at low risk, patients with high-risk features including strong family history of adverse aortic events, and in centers whose outcomes are such that the risk of surgery at lower aortic size is far less than the risk of progression of disease or significant adverse event. This manuscript critically evaluates recent literature to suggest in which patients and at what type of centers a more aggressive prophylactic approach should be entertained.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.