Using Natural Language Processing in the LACE Index Scoring Tool to Predict Unplanned Trauma and Surgical Readmissions in South Africa.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Umit Tokac, Jennifer Chipps, Petra Brysiewicz, John Bruce, Damian Clarke
{"title":"Using Natural Language Processing in the LACE Index Scoring Tool to Predict Unplanned Trauma and Surgical Readmissions in South Africa.","authors":"Umit Tokac, Jennifer Chipps, Petra Brysiewicz, John Bruce, Damian Clarke","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unplanned and potentially avoidable readmission within 30 days post discharge is a major financial burden.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To use text-based electronic patient records to calculate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score using a natural language processing technique to establish the feasibility and usefulness of the text-based electronic patient records in identifying patients at risk for unplanned readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of electronic patient records for general and trauma surgery in a hospital in South Africa (2012-2022) was conducted using the LACE score. Validated sentiment analysis analyzed free text components of electronic patient records to compute the CCI score and to establish the feasibility and usefulness of the LACE score in identifying patients at risk for unplanned readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trauma surgery patients had a mean LACE score of 5.91 (SD = 2.41), with 8.44% scoring 10 or higher and a specificity and sensitivity of 91.63% and 13.81%, respectively. The general surgery patients had a mean LACE score of 7.75 (SD = 3.04), with 10.63% scoring 10 or higher and a specificity of 71.47% and a sensitivity of 44.80%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LACE scores significantly predicted unplanned readmissions in both trauma (β = 0.11, p < 0.001; OR = 1.112, 95% CI [1.082, 1.143]) and general surgery (β = 0.15, p < 0.001; OR = 1.162, 95% CI [1.130, 1.162]) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LACE score demonstrated the predictive value for readmission in trauma and general surgery patients. The LACE score was relatively effective in identifying patients who were less likely to be readmitted but showed limitations in identifying patients at higher risk of readmission. However, the successful use of natural language processing for data extraction of comorbidities shows promise on addressing the challenges around text-based medical records.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unplanned and potentially avoidable readmission within 30 days post discharge is a major financial burden.

Aim: To use text-based electronic patient records to calculate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score using a natural language processing technique to establish the feasibility and usefulness of the text-based electronic patient records in identifying patients at risk for unplanned readmission.

Methods: A retrospective review of electronic patient records for general and trauma surgery in a hospital in South Africa (2012-2022) was conducted using the LACE score. Validated sentiment analysis analyzed free text components of electronic patient records to compute the CCI score and to establish the feasibility and usefulness of the LACE score in identifying patients at risk for unplanned readmission.

Results: Trauma surgery patients had a mean LACE score of 5.91 (SD = 2.41), with 8.44% scoring 10 or higher and a specificity and sensitivity of 91.63% and 13.81%, respectively. The general surgery patients had a mean LACE score of 7.75 (SD = 3.04), with 10.63% scoring 10 or higher and a specificity of 71.47% and a sensitivity of 44.80%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LACE scores significantly predicted unplanned readmissions in both trauma (β = 0.11, p < 0.001; OR = 1.112, 95% CI [1.082, 1.143]) and general surgery (β = 0.15, p < 0.001; OR = 1.162, 95% CI [1.130, 1.162]) patients.

Conclusion: The LACE score demonstrated the predictive value for readmission in trauma and general surgery patients. The LACE score was relatively effective in identifying patients who were less likely to be readmitted but showed limitations in identifying patients at higher risk of readmission. However, the successful use of natural language processing for data extraction of comorbidities shows promise on addressing the challenges around text-based medical records.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信