Optimizing drug sensitivity assays in patient-derived tumor organoids: a comparison of IC50 estimation methods and experimental parameters.

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Biology Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/biomethods/bpaf012
Yidan Chen, Jian Zhang, Bin Zhang, Hong Kai Lee, Suyao Xie, Wei Shen, Xueqin Chen, Mingliang You, Chongyang Shen, Bing Xia, Huayang Xing
{"title":"Optimizing drug sensitivity assays in patient-derived tumor organoids: a comparison of IC50 estimation methods and experimental parameters.","authors":"Yidan Chen, Jian Zhang, Bin Zhang, Hong Kai Lee, Suyao Xie, Wei Shen, Xueqin Chen, Mingliang You, Chongyang Shen, Bing Xia, Huayang Xing","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpaf012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs) hold immense potential for personalized drug sensitivity testing, but accurate efficacy determination is crucial for clinical translation. This study investigated factors influencing the accuracy and reproducibility of drug sensitivity measurements in PDOs, focusing on half-maximal-inhibitory-concentration (IC50) calculation methods, drug concentration numbers, and plate types. PDOs were established from six primary cancer tissues, including two cervical resections, one lung biopsy, one lung pleural effusion, one breast biopsy, and one gastric resection. They were subjected to drug sensitivity assays with 21 single/combined treatments, encompassing chemotherapy and targeted therapy drugs, with concentrations standardized in fold. Utilizing 6- and 12-concentration setups, IC50 derived from GraphPad-Dose-response-Inhibition (DRI), LC-logit, and LC-probit methods were compared. Relative changes (RCs) in IC50 and area-under-the dose-response-curve (AUC) between setups and the impact of plate type on cell viability measurements were assessed. In the 12-concentration setup, no significant IC50 differences were observed among the calculation methods. Notably, GraphPad-DRI and LC-logit exhibited minimal RCs between the 6- and 12-concentration setups (0.035 and -0.033, respectively), indicating accurate IC50 quantification even with fewer drug concentrations. AUC correlated strongly with GraphPad-DRI-derived IC50 (R = 0.858) and demonstrated lower variance between technical replicates. Furthermore, opaque-bottom plates yielded higher precision in cell viability measurements compared to transparent-bottom plates. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing drug sensitivity testing in PDOs. By demonstrating the robustness of specific IC50 calculation methods and the feasibility of using fewer drug concentrations, this study contributed to the standardization and reliability of PDO-based drug sensitivity assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":"10 1","pages":"bpaf012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpaf012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs) hold immense potential for personalized drug sensitivity testing, but accurate efficacy determination is crucial for clinical translation. This study investigated factors influencing the accuracy and reproducibility of drug sensitivity measurements in PDOs, focusing on half-maximal-inhibitory-concentration (IC50) calculation methods, drug concentration numbers, and plate types. PDOs were established from six primary cancer tissues, including two cervical resections, one lung biopsy, one lung pleural effusion, one breast biopsy, and one gastric resection. They were subjected to drug sensitivity assays with 21 single/combined treatments, encompassing chemotherapy and targeted therapy drugs, with concentrations standardized in fold. Utilizing 6- and 12-concentration setups, IC50 derived from GraphPad-Dose-response-Inhibition (DRI), LC-logit, and LC-probit methods were compared. Relative changes (RCs) in IC50 and area-under-the dose-response-curve (AUC) between setups and the impact of plate type on cell viability measurements were assessed. In the 12-concentration setup, no significant IC50 differences were observed among the calculation methods. Notably, GraphPad-DRI and LC-logit exhibited minimal RCs between the 6- and 12-concentration setups (0.035 and -0.033, respectively), indicating accurate IC50 quantification even with fewer drug concentrations. AUC correlated strongly with GraphPad-DRI-derived IC50 (R = 0.858) and demonstrated lower variance between technical replicates. Furthermore, opaque-bottom plates yielded higher precision in cell viability measurements compared to transparent-bottom plates. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing drug sensitivity testing in PDOs. By demonstrating the robustness of specific IC50 calculation methods and the feasibility of using fewer drug concentrations, this study contributed to the standardization and reliability of PDO-based drug sensitivity assays.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology Methods and Protocols
Biology Methods and Protocols Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信