Cirrhosis and liver disease vs. adverse in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Fabian Falkenbach, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Mattia Longoni, Andrea Marmiroli, Quynh Chi Le, Calogero Catanzaro, Michele Nicolazzini, Marie-Lyssa Lafontaine, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal, Stefano Puliatti, Riccardo Schiavina, Carlotta Palumbo, Gennaro Musi, Felix K H Chun, Alberto Briganti, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F Shariat, Lars Budäus, Markus Graefen, Pierre I Karakiewicz
{"title":"Cirrhosis and liver disease vs. adverse in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Fabian Falkenbach, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Mattia Longoni, Andrea Marmiroli, Quynh Chi Le, Calogero Catanzaro, Michele Nicolazzini, Marie-Lyssa Lafontaine, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal, Stefano Puliatti, Riccardo Schiavina, Carlotta Palumbo, Gennaro Musi, Felix K H Chun, Alberto Briganti, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F Shariat, Lars Budäus, Markus Graefen, Pierre I Karakiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radical prostatectomy (RP) may be a treatment option for prostate cancer patients with cirrhosis and liver disease (CLD). However, the effect of CLD on adverse in-hospital outcomes after RP has not been well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were used to address National Inpatient Sample RP patients between 2005 and 2019. CLD severity was stratified as mild vs. moderate/severe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 191,050 RP patients, 1,559 (0.8%) had CLD. Of those, 1,515 (97.2%) vs. 44 (2.8%) were classified as having mild and moderate/severe CLD, respectively. Any CLD rate increased from 0.6% to 1.5% (2005-2019, EAPC: +7.9%, P < 0.001). CLD patients exhibited higher rates of all 15 examined adverse in-hospital outcomes. The absolute differences were largest for overall complications (+13.9%), length of stay >2 days (+8.9%), and blood transfusions (+4.0%, all P < 0.001). After detailed multivariable adjustment, CLD independently predicted higher rates of all 15 adverse in-hospital outcomes (P < 0.01). The detrimental effect was most pronounced for in-hospital mortality (multivariable odds ratio (OR) 8.74), infectious complications (OR 4.59), and hepatic complications (OR 4.45). Finally, a convincing dose-response relationship, where the effect magnitude of moderate/severe CLD was at least 3 times higher than that of mild CLD, applied in 4 of 15 comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CLD patients exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes after RP. However, mild CLD did not exert a prohibitive effect that would clearly preclude RP as a treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radical prostatectomy (RP) may be a treatment option for prostate cancer patients with cirrhosis and liver disease (CLD). However, the effect of CLD on adverse in-hospital outcomes after RP has not been well described.

Methods: Descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were used to address National Inpatient Sample RP patients between 2005 and 2019. CLD severity was stratified as mild vs. moderate/severe.

Results: Of 191,050 RP patients, 1,559 (0.8%) had CLD. Of those, 1,515 (97.2%) vs. 44 (2.8%) were classified as having mild and moderate/severe CLD, respectively. Any CLD rate increased from 0.6% to 1.5% (2005-2019, EAPC: +7.9%, P < 0.001). CLD patients exhibited higher rates of all 15 examined adverse in-hospital outcomes. The absolute differences were largest for overall complications (+13.9%), length of stay >2 days (+8.9%), and blood transfusions (+4.0%, all P < 0.001). After detailed multivariable adjustment, CLD independently predicted higher rates of all 15 adverse in-hospital outcomes (P < 0.01). The detrimental effect was most pronounced for in-hospital mortality (multivariable odds ratio (OR) 8.74), infectious complications (OR 4.59), and hepatic complications (OR 4.45). Finally, a convincing dose-response relationship, where the effect magnitude of moderate/severe CLD was at least 3 times higher than that of mild CLD, applied in 4 of 15 comparisons.

Conclusions: CLD patients exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes after RP. However, mild CLD did not exert a prohibitive effect that would clearly preclude RP as a treatment option.

肝硬化和肝病与根治性前列腺切除术后的不良住院结果
导论:根治性前列腺切除术(RP)可能是前列腺癌合并肝硬化和肝病(CLD)患者的一种治疗选择。然而,CLD对RP后不良住院结果的影响尚未得到很好的描述。方法:采用描述性分析、倾向评分匹配(PSM)、多变量logistic和泊松回归模型对2005 - 2019年全国住院RP患者进行分析。CLD严重程度分为轻度、中度/重度。结果:在191,050例RP患者中,1,559例(0.8%)发生CLD。其中,1515例(97.2%)对44例(2.8%)分别被归类为轻度和中度/重度CLD。任何CLD率从0.6%上升到1.5%(2005-2019年,EAPC: +7.9%, P < 0.001)。CLD患者在所有15项检查的不良住院结果中均表现出较高的发生率。总并发症(+13.9%)、住院天数(+8.9%)和输血量(+4.0%,均P < 0.001)的绝对差异最大。经过详细的多变量调整后,CLD独立预测所有15种不良住院结局的发生率较高(P < 0.01)。住院死亡率(多变量优势比8.74)、感染并发症(OR 4.59)和肝脏并发症(OR 4.45)的不利影响最为明显。最后,在15个比较中有4个应用了令人信服的剂量-反应关系,其中中度/重度CLD的影响幅度至少比轻度CLD高3倍。结论:CLD患者在RP后表现出更高的不良住院预后率。然而,轻度CLD并没有发挥禁止性作用,这将明显排除RP作为一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信