Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma in India: Real-World Scenario, Pitfalls, and Solutions.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1802655
Mansi Agrawal, Adwaith Krishna Surendran, Karthik Kanna Venkatesh, Praveen Nandha Kumar Pitchan Velammal, Sarvesh Zope, Anika Goel, Aarnav Pathak, Mallika Mittal, Varshitha K K, Archana Sameer Vinakar, Daksh Agrawal, Purvish M Parikh
{"title":"Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma in India: Real-World Scenario, Pitfalls, and Solutions.","authors":"Mansi Agrawal, Adwaith Krishna Surendran, Karthik Kanna Venkatesh, Praveen Nandha Kumar Pitchan Velammal, Sarvesh Zope, Anika Goel, Aarnav Pathak, Mallika Mittal, Varshitha K K, Archana Sameer Vinakar, Daksh Agrawal, Purvish M Parikh","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1802655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has introduced innovative blood- and stool-based biomarkers, improving early detection and enabling personalized solutions. Global and Indian adoption of CRC screening remains a public health challenge. This study evaluates the real-world utility of screening colonoscopy, as recommended by global guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A survey based on the American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines was designed, setting 45+ years as the cutoff age for colonoscopy screening. A Google form was shared via social media application with health care professionals. Participation was voluntary, responses were collected over 30 days, and data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,199 individuals' data were analyzed. Among these, 1,374 were eligible for screening colonoscopy, out of which only 7.14% (98/1,374) actually underwent the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among various cancer programs, screening sigmoidoscopy has proved to improve both CRC-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, its utilization is suboptimal, at best. Even among the highly educated medical community, the real-world utility was only in 7.14% of the eligible population. Barriers include invasive nature of intervention, need for appropriate bowel preparation, operator dependence, and small but significant risk of serious toxicity. An important method of increasing utility of screening colonoscopy is use of a test that can identify high-risk population, who can then be persuaded to undergo screening colonoscopy. This is the value of recently developed noninvasive blood- and stool-based tests, like Guardant Health's Shield. Being U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved with specificity of 90% and sensitivity of 84%, it should be offered to all eligible persons who can afford it, thereby increasing colonoscopy use and potentially saving lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"13 4","pages":"229-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1802655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has introduced innovative blood- and stool-based biomarkers, improving early detection and enabling personalized solutions. Global and Indian adoption of CRC screening remains a public health challenge. This study evaluates the real-world utility of screening colonoscopy, as recommended by global guidelines.

Methodology: A survey based on the American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines was designed, setting 45+ years as the cutoff age for colonoscopy screening. A Google form was shared via social media application with health care professionals. Participation was voluntary, responses were collected over 30 days, and data were analyzed.

Results: A total of 2,199 individuals' data were analyzed. Among these, 1,374 were eligible for screening colonoscopy, out of which only 7.14% (98/1,374) actually underwent the procedure.

Conclusion: Among various cancer programs, screening sigmoidoscopy has proved to improve both CRC-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, its utilization is suboptimal, at best. Even among the highly educated medical community, the real-world utility was only in 7.14% of the eligible population. Barriers include invasive nature of intervention, need for appropriate bowel preparation, operator dependence, and small but significant risk of serious toxicity. An important method of increasing utility of screening colonoscopy is use of a test that can identify high-risk population, who can then be persuaded to undergo screening colonoscopy. This is the value of recently developed noninvasive blood- and stool-based tests, like Guardant Health's Shield. Being U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved with specificity of 90% and sensitivity of 84%, it should be offered to all eligible persons who can afford it, thereby increasing colonoscopy use and potentially saving lives.

印度结直肠癌的筛查:现实世界的情况、陷阱和解决方案。
无创结直肠癌(CRC)筛查引入了创新的基于血液和粪便的生物标志物,改善了早期检测并实现了个性化解决方案。全球和印度采用结直肠癌筛查仍然是一项公共卫生挑战。根据全球指南的推荐,本研究评估了筛查结肠镜检查在现实世界中的效用。方法:根据美国医学协会(AMA)指南设计了一项调查,将45岁以上作为结肠镜筛查的截止年龄。通过社交媒体应用程序与卫生保健专业人员共享谷歌表单。参与是自愿的,在30天内收集反馈,并对数据进行分析。结果:共分析了2199人的数据。其中,1374名患者符合结肠镜筛查条件,其中只有7.14%(98/ 1374)患者实际接受了结肠镜筛查。结论:在各种癌症项目中,乙状结肠镜筛查已被证明可提高crc特异性死亡率和全因死亡率。不幸的是,它的利用率是次优的。即使在受过高等教育的医学界,现实世界的效用也只有7.14%的合格人口。障碍包括干预的侵入性、需要适当的肠道准备、操作者的依赖性以及小但重要的严重毒性风险。增加筛查性结肠镜检查效用的一个重要方法是使用一种可以识别高危人群的测试,然后可以说服他们接受筛查性结肠镜检查。这就是最近开发的非侵入性血液和粪便测试的价值,比如Guardant Health's Shield。由于美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准其特异性为90%,敏感性为84%,因此应向所有能够负担得起的符合条件的人提供,从而增加结肠镜检查的使用,并可能挽救生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信